Story Tags What are Tags?

This Story is Archived and Commenting is Closed

Comments: 121

• 
  Avg rating: (+11/-2 9)

  evolute50

  Nov. 17, 2006, 10:04 a.m.

  Well, ain't that just peachy. The Republicans give themselves a Boehner. Better than giving it to a page, I guess.

  4 Replies

  • 
    Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

    ptath2

    Nov. 17, 2006, 10:52 a.m.

    No one can be as good at it as Garry Studds, or Barney Frank.

    2 Replies

    • 
      Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

      PeterAP

      Nov. 19, 2006, 1:57 a.m.

      I guess I'm not old enough to remember all the details but if your recollection is true then it is sad that the guy was re-elected.

      Then again, my district just re-elected Ken Calvert. He once outed an opponent and scared people into giving him a narrow victory. Three weeks later he was caught in his car with a hooker. Then had the nerve to censure Clinton over Monica.

      Most recently he has used his office to enrich himself and his friends by steering highway funds to projects close to properties he owns.

      Who would vote for that?
    • 
      Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

      Dave59

      Nov. 18, 2006, 10:21 p.m.

      Well Foley must be good at it because he has the online evidence to prove it. I haven't seen Studds Or Frank with these credentials. So call that one butthead.
  • 
    Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

    Gungnir

    Nov. 17, 2006, 2:43 p.m.

    Subtle, yet low brow. Well done sir!
• 
  Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

  ETproductions

  Nov. 17, 2006, 10:06 a.m.

  Looks like the Republican leadership has come up with a solution to their recent record as architects of the most Do Nothing Congress in history. The solution? Change Nothing.
• 
  Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

  beachboy6000

  Nov. 17, 2006, 10:38 a.m.

  That pic of Boehner looks just like me!

  1 Reply

  • 
    Avg rating: (+1/-0 1)

    takeitorleaveit

    Nov. 17, 2006, 3:29 p.m.

    beachboy,

    You are right, he looks just like your twin brother.

    Common guys, you couldn't find a better picture of this guy?
• 
  Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

  mntnman444

  Nov. 17, 2006, 10:48 a.m.

  The pic looks like a mug shot!
• 
  Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

  FrankieT

  Nov. 17, 2006, 10:49 a.m.

  Evo - You bad!

  Beachboy - Maybe it is you! Do you have a Boehner in the family?

  WAs he that good when they had the power?
• 
  Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

  psydoc

  Nov. 17, 2006, 1:17 p.m.

  oh ZG, I see you have a naughty side...I like that!
• 
  Avg rating: (+8/-0 8)

  kedirian

  Nov. 17, 2006, 11:18 p.m.

  Good Heavens! Anybody ever seen a REPUBLICASN with a "Boehner'?

  1 Reply

  • 
    Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

    Silverghost

    Nov. 18, 2006, 3:57 a.m.

    Lets see...if you were touring the White House a little before 2000...Rev. S
• 
  Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

  deathray

  Nov. 17, 2006, 10:57 a.m.

  More of the same...sigh...
• 
  Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

  Virginia

  Nov. 17, 2006, 12:04 p.m.

  Is he still being investigated by the Ethics committee about what he knew or didn't do about the Foley problem?
• 
  Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

  Rroht

  Nov. 17, 2006, 12:05 p.m.

  Meanwhile, Al-Qaeda and Iran rejoice over Democrat take-over.

  15 Replies

  • 
    Avg rating: (+5/-0 5)

    Dave59

    Nov. 17, 2006, 8:23 p.m.

    I would like to know just how you might know what either Iran or Al-Qaeda are thinking?

    Do you have direct contact with the leadership of the government of Iran or with Al-Qaeda leaders? If you have this inside information you may want to talk with the state department and we can clarify all of the confusion over these matters.

    If you are not in direct communication with the two entities I mentioned I would suggest you shut-up about what they think. Because you haven't got even a freaking clue of what you are talking about.

    In your frothing mental hatred of liberals you seek to associate them with terrorism. For what ends, other than to remove your own frustration, I can not imagine. I do not agree with terrorists or their actions. I would kill them on sight if needed.

    You obviousley have given no reasonable thought to this baseless accusation.

    I can only state that if ignorance is bliss, you must be one very happy individual.

    13 Replies

    • 
      Avg rating: (+13/-1 12)

      ybdogsct

      Nov. 18, 2006, 9:07 a.m.

      Yes, those are indeed instances of misguided civil disobedience. I don't agree with the protesters' methods, although their cause is noble and their participation in America's democracy is something that should be admired (especially in light of our nation's sub-50% voting record.) But, to characterize the entire Democratic party by the actions of the fringe minority is a gross over-generalization. Most Democrats are more centrist in their views. After all, it's not as if the Republican "party of family values" doesn't also have its undesirable elements. For example:

      Look at the way the Republican evangelical base imposes its value system and dogma on everyone else.

      Look at how Corker aired a racist commercial against Ford by playing on the fear of interracial relationships.

      Look at how George Allen unapologetically called a James Webb staffer the racist phrase "macaca."
    • 
      Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

      ybdogsct

      Nov. 18, 2006, 9:09 a.m.

      Look at how Evangelical Christian Reverend Ted Haggerd had to resign after he had sex with a gay prostitute from whom he purchased meth.

      Look at how Ann Coulter has become the darling of the Republican party for spewing hate-filled rhetoric and accusing 9/11 widows of "enjoying their husbands' deaths."

      Look at how Bill O'Rielly has also become the darling of the Republican party despite attacking Jeremy Glick, son of 9/11 victim, and accusing him of betraying his father's memory by proclaiming truthfully that Reagan and Bush Sr. had funneled weapons, money, and support to Al Qaeda for many years and should be held accountable for the rise of Osama bin Laden.
    • 
      Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

      ybdogsct

      Nov. 18, 2006, 9:10 a.m.

      Look at how Republicans voted Trent Lott back into party leadership even after he had resigned before as Senate Majority Leader due to statements he made saying the United States would have been better off if segregationist candidate Strom Thurmond had won the presidency in 1948: "We stand for the segregation of the races and the racial integrity of each race."

      Look at how a Texas grand jury indicted Tom DeLay for conspiring to violate campaign finance laws -- the first House leader to be indicted while in office in more than a century. Tom Delay also helped gerrymander Texas districts to secure more Republican congressional seats. Just months later, two of Tom Delay's former aides were convicted in the Jack Abramoff scandal.

      Look at how the "Do-Nothing" Republican Congress voted to give themselves raises and voted against raising the minimum wage -- an adjustment that most economic experts agreed would have little detrimental effect to our national economy.
    • 
      Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

      ybdogsct

      Nov. 18, 2006, 9:10 a.m.

      Look at how John Negroponte supported and carried out an extreme US-sponsored policy of severe violations to human rights and international law by supervising the creation of the El Aguacate air base, where the US trained the far-right murderous Nicaraguan Contras during the 1980's. The base was used as a secret detention and torture center, and in August 2001, excavations at the base discovered the first of the corpses of the 185 people, including two Americans, who are thought to have been killed and buried at this base. During his ambassadorship, human rights violations in Honduras became systematic. The infamous Battalion 316, trained by the CIA and Argentine military, kidnaped, tortured and killed hundreds of people. Negroponte knew about these human rights violations and yet continued to collaborate with them, while lying to Congress.

      Look at how Pat Buchanan hired staff members with ties to white Supremacy and militia groups and had close ties to Nixon's Watergate crimes.
    • 
      Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

      ybdogsct

      Nov. 18, 2006, 9:11 a.m.

      Look at Dick Cheney who was responsible as CEO of Halliburton for corporate tax evasion, illegal arms sales, bribing of foreign officials, and price gouging the US government. He was responsible for the granting of no-bid contracts while holding the position of VP to Halliburton. He also lied to the US public about Iraq's nuclear activities and how American troops would be "greeted as liberators."

      Look how Rove originally failed to disclose to prosecutors that he had talked to Time magazine reporter Matt Cooper about the outed CIA operative, Valerie Plame, back in 2003. Months before Rove acknowledged speaking to Cooper about the CIA status of Plame, reporter Robert Novak told Rove's lawyer the Rove might have disclosed Plame's CIA work to Cooper.

      Look at how John Ashcroft rounded up and imprisoned over 1200 men of Middle Eastern descent based largely on pretextual immigration violations and refused to disclose their identity and location and the reason for their detention.
    • 
      Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

      ybdogsct

      Nov. 18, 2006, 9:12 a.m.

      Look at how Robert Novak damaged US security by irresponsibly and illegally reporting the CIA cover of Ambassador Robert Wilson's wife (who is an operative), as part of a retaliation for his report that concluded there was no attempt by Iraq to purchase yellowcake uranium ore from Niger.

      Look at Jerry Falwell who stated that the attacks on September 11, 2001, were the result of God removing a protective barrier from the United States as punishment for the nation's acceptance of homosexuals and feminists.

      Look at how Republicans shamelessly blame Clinton for 9/11 despite the fact that clinton had been out of office for almost 1 year and had passed an intelligence document to Bush entitled "Osama bin Laden Determined to Strike Inside the U.S."

      Look at how Bush misled the country into believing that Iraq had WMDs by downplaying, redacting, or rephrasing dissenting opinions within the intelligence community that tried to explain that intelligence on Iraq was not 100% reliable.
    • 
      Avg rating: (+2/-0 2)

      ybdogsct

      Nov. 18, 2006, 9:13 a.m.

      Look at how Bush misled the country into believing that Saddam had connections with Al Qaeda by again disregarding the dissenting opinions within the intelligence community and ignoring the deep religious divide between Saddam (a Sunni) and Al Qaeda (primarily Shiite).

      Look at how Bush has failed to find Osama Bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri, who were responsible for the 9/11 attacks (not Saddam!), and has even said on public television that he "doesn't care where Osama Bin Laden is."

      Look at how Despite the fact that Democrats have been asking for a graduated list of objectives with a flexible timeline, Bush keeps repeating that Democrats have no plan for Iraq when it is Bush and Rumsfeld who have not had a plan to end sectarian violence since the fall of Baghdad.

      Look at how leaders of the "party of family values" attempted to coverup, or at the very least, failed to notify authorities of Mark Foley's actions.
    • 
      Avg rating: (+8/-0 8)

      ybdogsct

      Nov. 18, 2006, 9:14 a.m.

      Look at how Bush, Rumsfeld, and top Pentagon officials scapegoated low level military personnel -- the soldiers who are actually risking their lives in combat in Iraq -- for the acts of torture committed at Abu Ghraib, even when there were indications that they were given the order or the green light to conduct "severe interrogation methods" from superior officers.

      Look at how cronyism caught up to Bush when his unqualified FEMA director appointee, Michael Brown, failed to anticipate the ramifications of a Category 4 hurricane on New Orleans' levees and then failed to provide timely aid to the hurricane victims. Of course, Bush at first claimed he trusted Michael Brown, but then turned him into a scapegoat when public outcry over the disaster response threatened to reach the White House.

      Look at how Dick Cheney allowed Lewis Libby to disclose the identity of CIA operative Valerie Plame and then lie about it when questioned under a federal investigation.
    • 
      Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

      ybdogsct

      Nov. 18, 2006, 9:15 a.m.

      Look at how Bush and Rumsfeld clearly violated the Constitution (particularly the 4th Amendment) when they conducted an illegal NSA wireless surveillance program to spy on U.S. citizens -- an impeachable offense.

      Look at how Halibruton and other defense contractors have overcharged the U.S. government for rebuilding projects in Iraq by acquiring no-bid contracts, and yet there is no accountability for the billions of lost U.S. tax dollars.

      Look at how Dick Cheney shot his friend in the face with a shotgun, and later accepted his friend's apology on national television for the distress that the entire sitution must have caused him.

      Look at how Dick Cheney allowed the Republican leadership to use the threat of gay marriage as a political wedge to scare "values voters" into voting Republican despite the fact that his own daughter is gay.

      Look at how Bush had to deal with the fiasco that was Harriet Meyers before the nominations of Samuel Alito and John Roberts.
    • 
      Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

      ybdogsct

      Nov. 18, 2006, 9:16 a.m.

      Look at how Bush and many in the Republican party disregard the majority of the scientific community: Bush advocates teaching Creationism in schools, is against the public funding of stem cell research, and denies the effects of global warming (Kyoto Protocol?).

      Look at how Bush has squandered the balanced budget and the surpluses inherited from the Clinton Administration and has plunged the country into record levels of budget deficit by overspending so much that he has even turned away traditional fiscal conservatives. So much for the stereotype of the "tax-and-spend" liberal. Bush has "spent" more than most, if not all, other presidents.

      Look at how the Republican leadership dodges the Border Fence plan during an election year, fearing a split between pro-business Republicans who want to exploit cheap Mexican labor and hawkish Republicans who claim that a building Border Fence is a matter of national security.

      1 Reply

      • 
        Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

        ybdogsct

        Nov. 18, 2006, 9:26 a.m.

        Look at how General Shinseki was fired after stating that it would take several hundred thousand U.S. troops to keep the peace after the fall of Saddam's regime -- a prediction, which even General Abizaid and Donald Rumsfeld later admitted to be true.
    • 
      Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

      Dave59

      Nov. 18, 2006, 9:51 p.m.

      I want to tell you in no uncertain terms that there were no terrorist training camps operating in Iraq when we invaded. If you have evidence to the contrary I would like to see it. I think you cannot produce it.

      As for many of the other things you brought up...Just what does it have to with Iraq or the war or Al-Qaeda?

      The questions you raise are to do with matters that are within this contry and are not even close to concerned with the foriegn conflict.

      I also find most of your claims fallacious and with out any merit. IE: You are full of bullcrap and you just hope somebody will believe it.

      I do have to have some respect for the fact that you have remembered every talking point the republicans have used since Ronald Reagan was in office. But seriousley most of these don't apply anymore and some of the things you say are just no so.

      The attempt at misdirection is very good as a try though. I am truly sorry it does not impress me.
    • 
      Avg rating: (+0/-2 -2)

      ybdogsct

      Nov. 18, 2006, 9:21 a.m.

      Look at how Bush has adopted none of the 9/11 Commission's Recommendations to improve security.

      Look at how Bush keeps saying we are fighting the war in Iraq so that we "don't have to fight terrorists on American soil" and that the war on terror must be working since "we haven't had a terrorist attack since 9/11." Americans are dying every day from terrorist attacks in Iraq. Does it matter whether American lives are being taken in Iraq versus on American soil? More Americans have died in Iraq than in the terrorist attacks on 9/11. The terrorist don't need to attack us on American soil when they can do it on their home turf.
  • 
    Avg rating: (+1/-0 1)

    truthaddict

    Nov. 17, 2006, 8:25 p.m.

    what else did Rush say today?
• 
  Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

  Virginia

  Nov. 17, 2006, 12:08 p.m.

  Another issue arouse in a story 14 days ago about this man, "Army Times: Boehner refuses to apologize for faulting generals."
• 
  Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

  Twistoflex

  Nov. 17, 2006, 12:13 p.m.

  It's amazing how entrenched in corruption the Repugnants have become and it's apparent that they are unable to clean up their act.

  1 Reply

  • 
    Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

    PeterAP

    Nov. 19, 2006, 2 a.m.

    I just have to wonder how you come up with that given the fact that I do not see much "moral" behavior from the cons. Talk is cheap and they do a lot of it.

    All Americans are sick and tired of what is happening in government. The Republicans have controlled the strings for the last decade and have gotten their comeuppance.

    If the newly elected folks don't do a better job, it will behoove us to throw them out too.
• 
  Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

  Virginia

  Nov. 17, 2006, 12:18 p.m.

  Here is another news story on the new minority leader Boehner: "After Ney Admits To Crimes, Boehner Refuses To Call For His Resignation" This is what this story was about 60 days ago: "Yesterday on Fox News Sunday, House Majority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) was asked whether Rep. Bob Ney (R-OH) should step down from Congress. Ney pled guilty last week to federal corruption charges, admitting to prosecutors that "he had accepted tens of thousands of dollars in illegal favors from Abramoff and from a Syrian businessman nicknamed 'the Fat Man.'"

  So many problems and all is forgotten when he is elected. Also forgotten are Lott's problems and he only won by one vote in the Senate to be the minority whip. All news is about the majority party, the Democrates, and problems they may be having with their learership. I guess the desire is to find fault with the winning party. Never mind the problems with the losing party and their leadership.
• 
  Avg rating: (+5/-0 5)

  kedirian

  Nov. 17, 2006, 11:21 p.m.

  luvmyprez is probably undernourished!
• 
  Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

  joemont

  Nov. 17, 2006, 6:28 p.m.

  Did that Jefferson (D-LA)_guy ever get all hs money thawed out?

  Go Chiefs!!!

  (:>)
• 
  Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

  PeterAP

  Nov. 19, 2006, 2:03 a.m.

  If Harry Reid broke the rules he needs to go too.

  Too many of these guys (on BOTH sides) know exactly how far they can stretch the law and still get away with it.

  DeLay is the perfect example except he may finally have gone too far.
• 
  Avg rating: (+2/-0 2)

  time4change

  Nov. 17, 2006, 1:01 p.m.

  Are the repubs deaf ??? or maybe just so self-righteous/arrogant that they need an even bigger message ('08)....Americans have demonstrated that they are more than willing to speak up !!

  1 Reply

  • 
    Avg rating: (+1/-0 1)

    PeterAP

    Nov. 17, 2006, 11:32 p.m.

    Time...

    I think you answered your own question.

    Man you guys have gotten harder to find ever since Netscape changed their story picks.
• 
  Avg rating: (+4/-0 4)

  looter

  Nov. 17, 2006, 1:14 p.m.

  Oh, Boy, he looks like someone from the Chicago Mafia, Ready to every illegal and dirty.
• 
  Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

  zippercat1

  Nov. 17, 2006, 1:17 p.m.

  Not only that, he's a republican, he probably is.
• 
  Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

  looter

  Nov. 17, 2006, 3:19 p.m.

  So you agree that picture is Thug picture. Well, angles or appearance will not change a man... even in the link you gave here he looks like a Thug. I don't know the man.... so no more comments about him but his appearance.
• 
  Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

  procyon

  Nov. 18, 2006, 8:42 a.m.

  Thanks for the link. Strictly apolitcally speaking, the Netscape-published pic of Boehner is definitely skewed.

  And if the man is a thug from any angle, then why not publish the well-dressed clean cut photo from the above link? Aren't thugs well dressed?

  The plain answer is: this press wants to convey a visceral repulsion to the viewer.
• 
  Avg rating: (+0/-2 -2)

  Rroht

  Nov. 17, 2006, 1:23 p.m.

  Well, fortunately, the counrty realizes they were tricked by the Democrats. All they wanted was power...their "act" of having integrity is already a joke (aka Harry Reid and John "cut and run" Murtha), their plan for change is to destroy the economy by raising taxes...meanwhile, terrorists and countries like Iran are giving the Democrats the "thumbs up".

  ...and your still stuck on what the Republicans are doing?

  Well, at least your gone in less than 2 years...

  2 Replies

  • 
    Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

    Rroht

    Nov. 17, 2006, 3:09 p.m.

    ...not frightened of them at all. In a short while they will be gone.

    1 Reply

    • 
      Avg rating: (+2/-0 2)

      joeeddie

      Nov. 17, 2006, 4:42 p.m.

      And you are posting like a dyed in the wool Democrat and not the Centrist that you so prolifically claimed to be before the elections. I sense that your posts are somewhat overly supportive of the Democrats to be a true Centrist. I will glady give up control of the House & Senate to retain control of the Whitehouse in 2008. Hillary and Joe Biden are both unelectable and you know it.
• 
  Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

  mntnman444

  Nov. 17, 2006, 2:37 p.m.

  "Tricked" by democrats? So now the MAJORITY of americans are too dumb to recognize the difference between the 2 parties?Since you still haven't realized why republicans lost,what makes you so sure that americans will want you in 2 yrs?I think the election proves that americans feel that they were "tricked" by republicans not democrats.
• 
  Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

  Rroht

  Nov. 17, 2006, 3:07 p.m.

  Basically, the Democrats had no issues of their own to run on. Their whole strategy was...bring down the republicans at all costs, even if it means trying to tear the counrty apart.

  So, they spent the last three years complaining about a war, and spent all their efforts trying to block anything which would help us against terrorism.

  Well, as of this week, 4 out of 5 people (newsweek poll) say the Democrats have no plan concerning Iraq.

  Robert Ruebin comes out 5 days after the election and says we absolutely have to raise taxes.

  Hillary Clinton comes out and says we're going to have to nationalize health care, even though some of you won't like it.

  It's just as we expected...

  Let's be honest, at least the Republicans ran on issues. All the Democrats did was run against Bush and the war in Iraq.

  4 Replies

  • 
    Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

    tchef

    Nov. 17, 2006, 6:38 p.m.

    That's funny I consider Bush and the war two very big issues. Bush used faulty intel to get us into this war, Then completely screwed it up, and now we are stuck with no good solution. That sounds like an issue to me.

    Let's talk about how our rights are being trampled on. Warrentless wire taps anyone? That sounds like and issue to me. There is no reason those wiretaps couldn't be done with some kind of oversight. Even a special commision to expidite the process. It is never a good idea to let anyone this kind of power with no oversight be they Demacrat, Republican, or independent. Remember, absolute power corrupts absolutely.
  • 
    Avg rating: (+2/-1 1)

    PeterAP

    Nov. 17, 2006, 11:38 p.m.

    Maybe you need to pay attention to something other than Rush's brilliant discourse.

    There is the minimum wage, the environment, Homeland Security, the deficit, and a number of other subjects the Demos have discussed the last several months.

    And it's not about raising taxes, it's about not allowing the ridiculous Bush tax cuts to the rich continue on. There is a difference.

    Republicans had NOTHING to run on other than "vote Democrat and the terrorists will attack us again".

    Very constructive!

    2 Replies

    • 
      Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

      Dave59

      Nov. 18, 2006, 10:08 p.m.

      Well I'll give you one point...we need to uh reform homeland security. I pretty much sucks right now.

      I note the down fall of the FEMA people during Katrina. They are under the control of Chertov and "Homeland Security" yes?

      As far as Medi-Care goes the Bush administration cost this country more money than ever before by the prescrption drug plan and allowing the drug companies to profit from it. Yes we need Reform but not that kind.

      As far as Social Security is concerned All the plan the President has is to privitize some contributions. So what?

      I must ask what domestic terrorism? Unless you think that anyone who isn't a right wing fundie is a terrorist. I can assure you you are not only wrong but if you screw with us you might find out that you dumb redneck idiots aren't the only ones with guns.
    • 
      Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

      PeterAP

      Nov. 19, 2006, 1:53 a.m.

      Republicans gave up on Social Security Reform and Medicare Reform when they realized their method of helping out the money fund managers at the expense of everyone else was not going to work.

      Homeland Security/Terrorism...they had no ideas other than keep fighting in Iraq and don't vote for Democrats.

      The cons once again tried to get people to the polls with initiatives against gay marriage since that, of course, is the biggest obstacle in this country.
• 
  Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

  Rroht

  Nov. 17, 2006, 3:11 p.m.

  "I hear the Dems, Iran, and the Terrorists are going to do a reality show - you know like Wife Swap."

  If you don't believe me, google the latest Iran Presidential and al-qaeda statements. In each case, they are glad Democrats have won.

  Al-Qaeda said this election (electing democrats) was a step in the right direction.

  1 Reply

  • 
    Avg rating: (+2/-1 1)

    looter

    Nov. 17, 2006, 3:27 p.m.

    Well... Al-Qaeda and Iran if they are glad are going to buried in silence and darkness, without any collatral damage. That's the way war against terror must be fought. They live in Shadows, we won't turn on the light, we will shut any possibility of those souls seeing anymore light. And the rhetoric of the terrorists will forever be dissoloved in the celebration of peace, prosperity and equality of all. For that Democrats are the only way. That's the way we do things. Al-Qaeda and others who are conspiring against peace and equality will not know what hit them. When hell fire fries their bones they will know what they mongered for was nothing but hell and Democrats made it a bit easier for them to reach that hell fire fast.

The first 55 comments are shown. Show all 121 comments »