Continuing Improvements. Tell Us How We’re Driving! Send us Feedback

Companies to pull ads from Coulter's Web site »

Posted By Aidenag 1 year, 7 months ago in News
9.8

Scale of 1 to 10

Read: 26

Propped: 154

Comments: 240

Click Prop It to Raise Score
Prop it

At least three major companies want their ads pulled from Ann Coulter's Web site, following customer complaints about the right-wing commentator referring to Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards as a "faggot." Verizon, Sallie Mae and NetBank each said they didn't know their ads were on AnnCoulter.com until they received the comp

Read Full Story at cnn.com »

240 Comments Report

Submitted By:
Aidenag

Photographer by day, news junkie by night. My main areas of interest are politics and the environment. If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions ...

Also submitted:

Related Articles:

Why not submit a story?

Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 240
  • 100%
    Aidenag1 year, 7 months ago

    Washington Mutual Bank just pulled out as well according to Dailykos. http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/3/5/141633/

    Reply

    5 Replies

  • 100%
    uncleT1 year, 7 months ago

    What's the story about Edwards behind this label? I thought he was a married family man who came from modest roots.

    Reply

    5 Replies

    • 100%
      Bkumm1 year, 7 months ago

      No story. That's at least half the point. She's a nut case.

      Reply
      • 0%
        jordan111 year, 7 months ago

        What's the story about Edwards behind this label?>>>>>

        The story is that little annie is the poster child for conservative 'values.' And offending/lying about opponents is one of those values.

        Reply

        3 Replies

    • 82%
      Bkumm1 year, 7 months ago

      Heh, heh, ha, ha, ha. That is GREAT stuff. I hope this Conwoman goes down in flames. She has been spreading her hate, lies, spin and half-truths long enough. Bye, Ann. We'll be seeing you on Hollywood Square.

      Reply

      30 Replies

      • 75%
        quicksilver06021 year, 7 months ago

        "Tom, I'll choose Jon Stewart to block"... ;-D

        Reply

        15 Replies

      • 100%
        Taganan1 year, 7 months ago

        Bkumm - So unlike the hate, lies, spin and half-truths spread by the Left. I don't think so. There is too much of it on both sides. Her opinion has just as much right to be expressed as yours.

        Reply

        13 Replies

    • 100%
      deathray1 year, 7 months ago

      Well, this should give her pause, hitting her where she pays the most attention...her bank account.

      I hope that those companies which rescind their sponsorship see fit to redirect some of that ad money to more moderate and positive sources.

      I'm glad that her corporate sponsorship is taking some action; I wonder how many other corporate sponsors will remain, now that some have already left.

      Whatever companies do remain sponsors should be boycotted.

      Reply

      8 Replies

      • 100%
        Bkumm1 year, 7 months ago

        Right on. If O'Lie, dangit why do I keep doing that? If O'Reilly can do it so can we.

        Just on her site, no adds except for a couple of Google ads. Hard to get on her site, must be a lot of traffic.

        Reply
        • 0%
          GoldStandard1 year, 7 months ago

          So when the Dixie Chicks are boycotted it's "censorship", yet you wish the opposition to be treated the same way. Incidently, I'm not pro-Coulter, I'm anti-hypocrisy.

          Reply

          5 Replies

        • 0%
          lfergie8121 year, 7 months ago

          Open your mouth and let the hot air out. Talk more type less.

          Reply
        • 0%
          aniokly1 year, 7 months ago

          Who were here sponcers? Any big companies? Just wondering who sponcers these websites.

          Reply

          5 Replies

          • 0%
            Bkumm1 year, 7 months ago

            I know that as a member of the spincycle you like to have your news and information spoon-fed to you, but if you take just a minute and read the article you'll find out.

            Reply

            3 Replies

          • 0%
            MWLeach431 year, 7 months ago

            Sponsors

            Reply
          • 100%
            giss1 year, 7 months ago

            Ann Coulter will always have an open invitation by the media to spout her hateful views. This has been going on for years now, nothing new here. She tries to get attention by making rash remarks, and it works. When will the media get wise to her act? I'm looking at you, NBC (Today show appearance just last month and on MSNBC's Hardball), and CNN (Paula Zahn, formerly of Fox News channel). CNN (Certainly Not News) has been trying to outFox Fox News with people like Glen Beck. We know Coulter's a regular on Fox News, but that's not a legitimate news channel, just a propaganda network for the RNC. Apparently Ann Coulter speaks for a large contingent of the Republican Party, which tells you what a bunch of hate-filled racists they are.

            Reply

            5 Replies

            • 50%
              Beau78901 year, 7 months ago

              The media will never "get wise" to people making provocative remarks in order to get attention. The media LOVES it when people make provocative remarks to get attention. It gets THEM attention in the form of a larger audience, which brings them more money in the form of higher ad revenue, which is why they exist in the first place.

              Reply
              • 0%
                Taganan1 year, 7 months ago

                giss - Ann Coulter doesn't speak for me and I'm Rep. I take her with a grain of salt, sometimes she actually makes a legitimate point. No one is wrong ALL of the time.

                The Left refuses to admit ANY bias in the news media, except for Fox, which actually has both sides equally represented. They say Fox News is right wing propaganda. Well, they had Coulter, Darryl Hannah and an evironmentalist pushing GW on talking about the environment and energy. While I don't agree with Darryl Hannah about many things, she made more sense than either of them. Coulter kept on about candles and made a fool of herself.

                My church is an African church based in Westville, South Africa and we are very conservative and very multi-racial. I see much more hate coming from the Left.

                Reply

                3 Replies

            • 0%
              x00000000091 year, 7 months ago

              I'd say Faggit, because replacing the O with an I sounds more derogatory.

              Reply

              16 Replies

              • 100%
                x00000000091 year, 7 months ago

                hay, she could have called him the worst most insulting, degrading of words in the English language... a liberal.

                Reply

                6 Replies

              • 100%
                MWLeach431 year, 7 months ago

                A faggot is a bundle of sticks, just in case any of you forgot what a dictionary is. Man, don't you have something better to do. Anyway I have to finish being audited to pay for some welfare receipients to go back to New Orleans, so Ray Nagin won't sue the government for lost revenues.

                Reply

                8 Replies

            • 100%
              aniokly1 year, 7 months ago

              Never mind. Someone alreadyy called, and said she cancelled her Version for just this reason. I don't have Version, and I doubt a boycott would work for this person. She is not well-liked even by Republicans. I do think it is silly to fight over a word. If we have fits over every word theat offends, we won't be able to speak.

              Reply
              • 0%
                JRad1831 year, 7 months ago

                Don't worry about Ann Coulter. We will all witness her downfall. Did you notice her sheer arrogance as she smugly delivered her uncomedic, vapid material?

                Soon, as she gracelessly ages, the corporate mechanism which created her will dispose of her - as they did Brittany Spears, Paris Hilton, Anna Nicole Smith & scores of other short-shelf-life blondes.

                Reply

                1 Reply

                • 0%
                  vor1 year, 7 months ago

                  This is hardly her downfall. As she said on Hannity there must have been 20 incidents like this one that should have been career enders. She thrives on controversy, that is how she makes a living. Her followers see no error in her ways. If they could they would be running around calling everyone on the left "fa--ots". In the schoolyard taunt meaning of the word, of course.

                  These are sick people, full of hatred for their fellow man. The left should go out of the way not to respond to these people. For it is the response they most enjoy.

                  Reply
                • 100%
                  Nate491 year, 7 months ago

                  Good.

                  Reply
                  • 0%
                    fudgie1 year, 7 months ago

                    I forgot what I was going to post after seeing that pic of Coultergiest with the article.

                    He sure is handsome.

                    Reply
                    • 0%
                      fudgie1 year, 7 months ago

                      She harvests souls.

                      Reply

                      1 Reply

                      • 0%
                        SamMyam1 year, 7 months ago

                        Not true. That's too much like work. Besides, the only time she's been close enough to anyone's soul, it was Matt Drudge, who has no such appendage.

                        Reply
                      • 100%
                        ETproductions1 year, 7 months ago

                        Coulter is certainly deserving of censure by her advertisers. The more fundamental problem is that the RNC of today has built its coalition of support on the very hatred, bigotry, financial elitism and racism that Coulter and Republican ad agencies adore.

                        The more senatorial of the party know better then to openly say such things, but their actions speak louder than their words. And they have for years invited Coulter to speak to them because she was, up until this extra egregious slip, able to get away with saying in comical ways the very things they so deeply believe.

                        Reply

                        1 Reply

                        • 100%
                          ConquerorWyrm1 year, 7 months ago

                          "...saying in comical ways the very things they so deeply believe."

                          Minus the 'comedy'. Falling on a banana peel is comedy...jabbing someone in the eye with a sharp, splintered stick (analogy of Coulter's 'humor') is not

                          Reply
                        • 100%
                          americanmom1 year, 7 months ago

                          And yet the dems still support John edwards, wheres the big stink over him and his bloggers, what about kerry trashing america in another country. dems have such little minds its almost pointless to even communicate with them. why didnt any of the sponsors drop these people. Cause they all are also left leaning wingnuts.

                          Reply

                          3 Replies

                          • 0%
                            Lurch1 year, 7 months ago

                            In other words,

                            Haters of America Unite in Defense of AC!

                            Right?

                            Reply
                            • 60%
                              ryan6011 year, 7 months ago

                              At least Kerry apologized for those remarks.

                              When is Coulter going to do the same?

                              For that matter, when is McCain going to apologize for calling the troops killed in Iraq "wasted lives"? The Right demanded (and got) an apology from Obama for saying almost the same thing.

                              Yes, people on both sides of the aisle sometime say stupid things. At least people on the Left don't think that admitting that they were wrong is a sign of weakness.

                              Reply
                            • 100%
                              UBCONFUSE1 year, 7 months ago

                              Hey Ann, thanks for yanking Edwards out of the closet. I was totally unaware of his leanings, but it sure explains some doubts I had.

                              This is sort of like John Kerry making a comment about Cheney's daughter and then acting as if it was not intended to hurt anyone.

                              In Ann's case, she knew it would sting Edwards and did the right thing, she yanked him out of the closet. Way to go Ann. The left and the Democrats are always going to be upset when the truth comes out. For the Dems, lies are the truth and form the basis for their carefully crafted public persona. Look at Hillary, last week she was a Black Woman, until Obama jumped in and people were forced to reconcile what their lying eyes were telling them. Look at that, Hillary is White! OMG

                              Reply

                              3 Replies

                              • 100%
                                vor1 year, 7 months ago

                                That is insane logic you are using. If your views represent those of majority of the Right (and I believe they do) you guys are living in a very sick world.

                                Reply
                                • 100%
                                  ConquerorWyrm1 year, 7 months ago

                                  that might just be the stupidest post I've ever read.

                                  son, there is more evidence to place GWBush (prep school cheerleader, dear friends with 'Jeff Gannon', etc) than there is Mr. Edwards, family man.

                                  you are a fool

                                  Reply

                                  1 Reply