Hillary Clinton's Skimpy Executive Resume »
Posted by: ZiegfeldGirl 9 months agoClinton has never run a business, city, state, or Cabinet dept. She was a partner at Rose Law Firm, but did not administer it. She headed none of the non-profits boards her website says she joined. While she conducted the health reform task force in 1993, the plan it concocted collapsed. Clinton has never chaired a Senate committee.
Read Full Story at cbsnews.com
Join the Discussion 
+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 89
-
0%
ZiegfeldGirl9 months ago
"Hillary Clinton is ill-equipped to become president of the United States, commander-in-chief of the U.S. armed forces, and leader of the free world. Her executive experience is lighter than a fistful of feathers."
Being "First Lady" does not qualify one to run the entire country.
Reply-
0%
SonOfTheMask9 months ago
ZG, we all know that "Hillary Clinton, Candidate for President" is not about Hillary personally. It's about the Clinton Team. A vote for "Hillary Clinton" is a vote for Hillary, Bill, and the Clintonista machine. Hillary is merely the figurehead, the "customer-facing" side of the machine.
Reply -
-
0%
Dicax_Maximus9 months ago
DH - Is that the FBI at your door ? I thought publishing obscene & offensive material was a criminal offence ????
Reply
-
-
0%
lovemylibs9 months ago
She is a former first lady and a current junior senator from New York. Nuff said!
Reply
-
-
0%
marshx9 months ago
They always refer to an american president as the leader of the free world, in which case, who's the leader of the Dark side?
Reply
-
-
-
-
0%
AlphaGnosis9 months ago
Okay David, that one just hurt me. Please give a girl a warning next time!
Reply
-
-
-
0%
afoaf9 months ago
funny, I never read any articles about chelsea out boozing it up underage at bars...
Reply -
0%
ybdogsct9 months ago
ANIOKLY:
"Hillary did not even raise her own child. She had nannys to do that, and she wants to raise ours?."
Actually, Hillary volunteered in Yale's Child Study Center and New Haven's pediatric wing. Her seminal paper "Beyond the Best Interests of the Child" is still often cited by health experts today. Hillary also chaired the Arkansas Education Standards Committee (1982-92), Children's Defense Fund (1986-92), and Arkansas Children's Hospital Legal Services.
Aside from that, Chelsea is very well adjusted, more so than the Bush twins.
http://www.cnn.com/2007/LIVING/personal/09/27/j...
"When asked who was the child in the White House she always thought she'd want to emulate, she replied Chelsea Clinton. 'I think Chelsea Clinton is, is very kind and, um, smart and articulate," Jenna Bush said. 'She's always been very friendly to us, but we just wanted to be ourselves, but she was, she's beautiful and poised all the time.'"
Reply-
0%
GWHayduke9 months ago
HEEEEY!!
Why do you have to go and ruin the tea party?
Posting your contrarian facts and spoiling all of the opinionated hate and personal character attacks.
See, this is about demonizing someone's character and associating her own personal behavior with the actions of her husband.
Your facts and citations of altruism are obviously NOT welcome here.
Reply
-
-
0%
ybdogsct9 months ago
Contrast Chelsea Clinton with the Bush twins. Barbara Bush is a particularly heavy alcohol drinker and frequently gets Jenna into trouble.
Here's a scan of Barbara Bush's fake ID, confiscated by a bouncer from Toad's (a bar on Yale's campus).
http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/blbarba...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0...
"Austin police said they received a call from the manager of Chuy's Mexican restaurant who said minors were attempting to buy alcohol. Mr Bush's daughters, Jenna and Barbara, 'were alleged to have been involved,' according to a police statement. Jenna, a student at the University of Texas, who appeared in court only two weeks ago accused of underage drinking, allegedly tried to purchase the alcohol using someone else's identification. She did not contest the accusation."
ANIOKLY obviously doesn't know she's talking about, and has likely never even met Chelsea, nor Jenna and Barbara.
Typical.
Reply
-
-
0%
Dicax_Maximus9 months ago
Nah, it's obvious to me.... It's GOTTA be Hilary ! Her opponents appear to have relevant experience where she doesn't, done those silly little things like running massive budgets, states, companies etc, she hasn't. So, surely, it should be patently obvious that she's the perfect choice as the next politician to run the US....
Full of hot air, lies & deceit... Sounds like the PERFECT politician to me !!!
Cynicism off.....
Reply -
-
-
0%
Dicax_Maximus9 months ago
DH - A cracker that one, as the mouse can move very quickly from side to side, even backtrack if required, while skirting over the main issue..... Why was the dress pink, not blue ?
Reply
-
-
-
0%
Dicax_Maximus9 months ago
ZG - If that's the best they can come up with, were I Obama, I'd smiling around now....
Reply
-
-
-
0%
aniokly9 months ago
But they did look up scandalous stuff on Barak Hussein Obaama, and they leaked it to Novak as a warning to Osama bin Bama as he gets closer, and closer to the Chosen One in the polls in Iowa, and N H. I am sure she has some interesting items about the Pretty One too. She wants that nomination, and she will do whatever it takes to get it.
Reply -
0%
stephen-johnson9 months ago
Some of Hillary's support view this election as Bubba's third term rather than Hillary's first.
Although Hillary has never held an elective position, she has had some influence on Bubba's decisions. Certainly, she wasn't in the kitchen baking cookies all the while. And when the Lewinski scandal broke, it has Hillary who spearheaded the counterattack.
It would be an interesting campaign next year if I wasn't sick of it already. ;-)
Reply -
0%
Dionys9 months ago
Bush headed a few companies because daddy could get him a position. Without a doubt every single one of them failed and some were bailed out by his Daddy and/or the federal government. I guess this shouldn't come as a shock considering how he's (supposedly) run this country. Unfortunately we don't have anyone to bail us out of this terrible mess.
Reply -
-
0%
amazed9 months ago
so, because we've had eight years of an inexperienced Republican President we have to follow it with 8 years of an inexperienced Democratic President??
.. and that makes sense how? Especially since there are many Democratic candidates with substantially more experience?
To say nothing of the fact that there are over 200 million people in this country. Can we not find someone from some other family than these two to run the place? Neither family is even particularly good at it!
Reply-
0%
HateKoolAid9 months ago
Everybody has a different view on what qualifies as "experience". A CEO who has headed a couple a failed businesses has a lot more experience than a person who has never run one at all.
Reply
-
-
-
0%
ADAGUY9 months ago
It's interesting how this thread is nothing but one constant smear after another. But did you ever notice that no one can say a positive thing about their own candidate? Just smear the opponent. But this is true of all of you. Take a look back at the posts on this article. It is disgraceful that no one here can say a thing positive about any candidate.
But I would like anyone here, who is saying "Hillary will take instructions from Bill", to tell me any president who had a better economy while in office than Bill Clinton did!
It reminds me of how many republican hopefuls quote Truman, and Roosevelt. But did you ever hear any of them quote Nixon? Bush, Hoover? Even Reagan only is admired only in republican circles. The rest of us know better. Really, am I missing something here? if so please tell me.
Reply-
-
0%
ADAGUY9 months ago
You miss the point. Regardless of the content of the article, read the comments. Not one person has anything of value to say about the candidate. No one can say, "I won't vote for her because I feel she will raise taxes", or I am opposed to her because she wants national health care", or "I don't want Hillary in there because she is in favor of military cutbacks". Instead, all of the comments are nothing but insults slurs, and sarcasm. Why don't you all try growing up a bit, and talking like real grown ups?
Reply
-
-
-
0%
white-pawn9 months ago
Clinton would be a disaster. But then again, we're used to disastrous leaders. The Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton dynasty must end. Before they usher-in their New World Order.
We should avoid any candidate who is a member or has connections with the Council on Foreign Relations, as their stated purpose is to dismantle the Constitution and American sovereignty in favor of a North American Union, then a global government.
That leaves out most candidates from both parties.
Reply -
0%
MyCampingMall9 months ago
As Co-President, Senator Clinton claims to have the most experience of any candidate running for that office. But what does experience have to do with? Isn't it what one's broad outlook on the global scene more important than experience. The presidency is suppose to project the moral leadership of a world leader guiding a nation toward stability and economic prosperity. Good luck to all who dare to try to reach such goal.
Reply -
-
0%
SAAB76999 months ago
I don't care if a woman or a man or a dog or a cat is elected to be our next president.I just want some one who can run this country the way it is supposed to be run. PLEASE let there be someone who is REALLY qualified run and get elected.
Reply -
-
0%
CactusAnnie9 months ago
LOL, are you suggesting the Clinton's are old hippies? Never thought of it that way, but you do have a point!
Reply
-
-
0%
aniokly9 months ago
If Hillary would release her personal papers as First Lady from the Hillbilly *hore Hoppers Library in Arkansas we could all see how experienced, or not, she really is. What is in those papers that is so dmamging that they cannot be released until aftr the 08 election? Hmmm.
Reply -
0%
afoaf9 months ago
I love how Biden, Huckabee, Richardson and Dodd all get mentioned but, yet again, MSM leaves Ron Paul out of the story.
Reply -
0%
aniokly9 months ago
Look. we don't have to let the MSM choose our candidate. We have 18 candidates running. Our vote is our own. We can choose any one of those 18 people. Why are we so hung up on letting someone else make up our minds in the ballot box? Vote your conscience. I am.
Reply -
0%
wtagg9 months ago
I wonder if any of you consider yourself christians? Judging by comments and what the bible espouses, I would say no. Judging by the actions of other prominent christians, maybe.
It would be nice to see conversation about the actual talents or lack thereof, but judging as a Miss America contest truly demonstrates an issue with this country. We have been driven by a marketing aspect vs. a talent aspect for candidates. We have been reaping the spoils of that unfortunate course for years. It is time to change or we should expect nothing more than what we have been receiving.
Reply -
0%
simonsez9 months ago
She's just not the right person for the job and I think a lot of us on both sides recognize this. She is divisive at a time we need some sort of effort at unity.
Joe is probably the best on your side; Ron Paul on ours.
Reply
Submitted By:
ZiegfeldGirl
"An act of heroism, of extraordinary courage, the grandeur of it, won't easily inspire us to act in imitation, but it can inspire us ...
Related Articles:
Why not submit a story?
Also Propping This Article
Helixbuilder
berkeley
stephen-johnson
BronxBomber- Harbeas
joeeddie
not2needy
abntv
dexlovex2
simonsez
Groups Watching This
No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your group?
