Got feedback on the new design? We're Listening! Send us Feedback

McCain Withheld Controversial Abramoff Email »

Posted by: TechnologyExpert 6 months ago

166 Comments Report this Story

9.6

Scale of 1 to 10

Read: 46

Propped: 115

Comments: 166

Click Prop It to Raise Score
Prop it

On the stump, Sen. John McCain often cites his work tackling the excesses of disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff as evidence of his sturdy ethical compass. A little-known document, however, shows that McCain may have taken steps to protect his Republican colleagues from the scope of his investigation.

Read Full Story at huffingtonpost.com

Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 166
  • 0%
    donald516 months ago

    An article the other day said that McCain subpoenaed 750,ooo documents from Abramoff that could implicate a lot more Repugs... and why many didn't chose to run against him! McCain is not releasing them and should!

    Reply

    28 Replies

    • 0%
      DropkickaLib6 months ago

      Actually, many Demorats took Abramoff money also, Rep. Alan Mollihan from West Virginia for example. He kept the money after the scandal broke, while Rep. Shelly Moore Capito, the Republican member of the state's Congressinal delegation, returned it. Oddly enough, the investigations into Dems appear to have made little progress...hhhmmm.

      Reply

      27 Replies

  • 0%
    walden36 months ago

    Why does the media insisting on framing McCain as Saint McCain the maverick, the enemy of lobbyists, anti-corruption and champion of the little guy?

    The facts tell a completely different story.

    If you want more of the same then vote for more of the same.

    Reply

    19 Replies

    • 0%
      slate6 months ago

      Ah now comes the time to attack McCain, so goes it with politics. Too bad you fine folks will throw a fit if someone even thinks about looking into something connected with Saint BHO. Hell I'd bet you'd call people racists for soing that and even talk nonsense that we are planning to kill him or some insanity like that.

      Reply

      16 Replies

    • 0%
      GWHayduke6 months ago

      Come on Walden, you know the liberal media is framing McCain as St. McCain the Maverick etc. because he is a RINO liberal.

      Heck, the liberal media even reveres his POW status while others on these threads have called him a military apostate!

      Reply

      1 Reply

  • 0%
    nikkibabe6 months ago

    Another Bush in the making for 2008. Scandal, lies, deception and protecting criminal elements in Republican Party.

    It is another Bush 4 years all over again if the country is not careful to dump this hypocrite.

    When the economy is crumbling, this idiot still talks about how he will fix Iraq.

    Reply

    17 Replies

    • 0%
      DropkickaLib6 months ago

      Unlike those honest Clintons who never accept dirty lobbyist money.

      Reply

      16 Replies

  • 0%
    THOMNH626 months ago

    nag nag nag, come on anything will be better than Hillary or a Muslim.

    Reply

    11 Replies

    • 0%
      GHOSTWHOWALKS6 months ago

      Nope. McCain is worse than Shrillery and Obama is just "Jim Jones" reincarnated. None of those three are worth a trip to the voting booth.

      Reply

      4 Replies

    • 0%
      donald516 months ago

      Thom, the Bigot,

      Well we see that you don't agree with the Constitution and equality of all Americans... please move to a fascist state.

      Reply

      4 Replies

    • 0%
      Lurch6 months ago

      McCain is the evil offspring of a Dubya/Billary mating.

      The power thirst of Hillary.

      The moral/ethical respect for life & the middle class of Dubya.

      The libido of Bill.

      Four more years of the cumulative worst of the twenty years.

      Reply
    • 0%
      Charlson6 months ago

      Ah, the maverick was really a team player. Protecting his fellow repubs is a worthy trait and we should elect him president, not.

      Reply

      5 Replies

      • 0%
        tanglang6 months ago

        Ok, this is 2008. The 'not' thing was lame back in the early 90's, and is even more lame today.

        Reply

        4 Replies

    • 0%
      jordan116 months ago

      This is too much.

      Reply

      9 Replies

      • 0%
        GHOSTWHOWALKS6 months ago

        Morning Jordan. If you believe that this is too much, better wear ear plugs because it's only going to get worse.

        McCain is even worse than Le Muffette and a bigger liar. Shrillery regardless of her attempts to duck and hide is just as bad. Have you forgotten the scandals she was involved in?

        Obama just another cult leader and isn't qualified to lead a Nation. I recommend you visit his church in Chicago before the next election. You'll see for yourself what their agenda really is.

        Reply

        8 Replies

    • 0%
      DropkickaLib6 months ago

      How did he roll over on water boarding? He doesn't want chaos in the wake of a rapid withdrawl. That doesn't make him a warmonger. The tip of Demoratic corruption is being covered up by the Dem leadership faster than a cat in a litter box. Maybe the new documents will expose more cash funneled to Reid, Daschle and Gephardt.

      Reply

      2 Replies

      • 0%
        Isoparm6 months ago

        Mc Cain is a war monger. he is supported by the same people that got us into the war in Iraq, and want to attack Iran. It's no coincendence that Joe Lieberman is one of his handlers, as well as the other neocons. McCain wil say and do anything to become prez. He denounced Falwell and his cons until he needed them. Now he claims to be one of them. Can you say flip-flop?

        Reply
        • 0%
          donald516 months ago

          Drop, so ignorant of the real facts... I am starting to feel sorry for your delusional state! How in the world did you get this way? Do you just listen to Rush Limbaugh and Faux Fox Facts? Is your Daddy beating these lies and deceptions into your brain daily?

          Reply
        • 0%
          jordan116 months ago

          What have I been thinking? Of course he needs to be ignored. I blocked him. Thanks for the push.

          Reply
          • 0%
            DropkickaLib6 months ago

            Those are facts available in newspaper articles published when the Abramoff scandal broke. Do a web search. If you don't know that prominent Dems received Abramoff money, then you've been poorly informed regarding the issue.

            McCain wasn't my choice but claims like this are untrue. McCain wants a successful conclusion to the war but I don't remember him cheering about it when it started. He does support policies in Iraq that appear to be working. The dramatic decline in violence in Iraq is a fact...a fact that the Dems avoid discussing like the Plague.

            Hater = Liberal term used to demonize Conservatives. Meant to intimidate into submission to Liberal orthodoxy.

            Reply

            22 Replies

            • 0%
              not2needy6 months ago
            • 0%
              Will13136 months ago

              Actually NO Democrats took money DIRECTLY from Abramoff....

              New York Times reporter Anne E. Kornblut falsely stated that Democrats accepted campaign contributions from indicted former lobbyist Jack Abramoff. In fact, according to the Center for Responsive Politics (here and here), only Republicans received contributions directly from Abramoff.

              Appearing on the December 16 edition of MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Matthews, Kornblut falsely claimed that Abramoff had given contributions to Democrats. Yet a Media Matters for America search of the Center for Responsive Politics database of campaign contributions did not find any contributions from Abramoff to Democrats or Democratic leadership political action committees.

              Reply

              8 Replies