Join the Discussion

Comments So Far: 124

• 0%

  engineer5 months, 2 weeks ago

  After the damage they have done, I don't feel sorry for them!!!

  Reply

  3 Replies

  • 0%

    donald515 months, 2 weeks ago

    They should be declared a terrorist organization and banned!

    Reply

    2 Replies

    • 0%

      SpareChange5 months, 2 weeks ago

      LOL

      Well hopefully the next administration will open up their files and do some investigation into crimes.

      We have to hold them accountable, otherwise, such behavior would be deemed acceptable (and legal)

      Reply

      1 Reply

      • baddad59Comment removed: User banned.
• 0%

  jordan115 months, 2 weeks ago

  I'll believe it when I see it. Ugly people don't go away easily.

  Reply

  31 Replies

  • 0%

    rimbaud5 months, 2 weeks ago

    You'd think the next election would be a no-brainer, 70% Democratic to 30% Republican. But it's going to be close, after all. If McCain had a strategy to end the Iraq war he would win!

    Reply

    20 Replies

    • 0%

      dunkirk5 months, 2 weeks ago

      He will claim he does by invading Iran. Wait for the propaganda to surface that Iran is solely responsible for the mess in Iraq and if they are put down it will all be quiet and peaceful. In the meantime Al Quida is growing stronger while the REPUBLICANS are off chasing windmills.

      Reply

      7 Replies

      • 0%

        slate5 months, 2 weeks ago

        Gosh, are ya sure you're not talking about the DNC when you mention implosions? You have been watching TV lately right?

        Where do you get your numbers 70% / 30%? The Dems barely won 2 years ago and MOST republicans stayed home.

        The Dem party has been out of touch with reality for so long now, this doesn't surprise me that you think the Rs are going to go away.

        Though the Republicans haven't done a very good job the last 8 years, that's a given, and they need to regroup and will likely lose this cycle. It will only take about 6 months of the Dems in charge before people start saying oh Chit what did we do? Especially if the far left's (Daily Kos, Huffinging and Moveoners) types start getting their policies out front.

        You on the Far left only think the rest of the country thinks like you do; you guys are the 'edger's' Coastliners. Middle America is far from radical left-wingers.

        Reply

        6 Replies

        • 0%

          dunkirk5 months, 2 weeks ago

          "The Dems barely won 2 years ago and MOST republicans stayed home."

          After most of the REPUBLICONS here claimed increases in both the house and sentate. Hmmmmmm

          "It will only take about 6 months of the Dems in charge before people start saying oh Chit what did we do?"

          Histporically thats far from accurate. It seems after Republican rule the country figures out it made a BIUG mistake and it usually brings in a long run of Democratic wins. Has something to do with the fact the middle class don;t like hte fact thta under REPUBLICANS they lose ground.

          Reply

          4 Replies

          • 0%

            slate5 months, 2 weeks ago

            Dunk Historically, after ANY party is in office for 8 years, there is a change of party in the WH. I'd think you were smart enough to figure that out and not be so 'proud' of the possible win. Come back when you get a second term defeat before you get too excited about it.

            Now if the Republicans or Dems win three straight, then you can gloat, until then it's the same ole same ole.

            Reply

            3 Replies

            • 0%

              mesodude5 months, 2 weeks ago

              " I'd think you were smart enough to figure that out and not be so 'proud' of the possible win."

              --I think it's very classy of you to concede that McLame will lose in Nov but why shouldn't dunkirk be allowed to be as giddy over the Dem's takeover of Congress in '04 as wingers still are of Bush's "landslide victory" over Gore in 2000 or his current 28% approval rating? Oh, wait...I just remembered--his approval rating isn't AS disgraceful as that of the Congress so I guess this calls for champagne toasts for the GOP. LMAO ;-P

              Reply
            • 0%

              slate5 months, 2 weeks ago

              Messo, did you say something?

              Reply

              1 Reply

              • 0%

                mesodude5 months, 2 weeks ago

                Shucks, slater...You really hurt my 'net feelings when you "ignore" my comments like that. LMAO I see that being outed as a racist has made you just a lil BITTER. ;-)

                Reply

        • baddad59Comment removed: User banned.
    • 0%

      ETproductions5 months, 2 weeks ago

      McCain DOES have a strategy to end the Iraq war. It's just goping to take some time. Like 100 years or so.

      Reply

      5 Replies

      • 0%

        slate5 months, 2 weeks ago

        Still spreading that propaganda lie ET?

        Reply

        4 Replies

        • 0%

          ETproductions5 months, 2 weeks ago

          How is quoting the guy a lie or propaganda? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFknKVjuyNk

          Sure he said that he wanted them there not in combat operations but as a maintenance force. But there are some gaping holes in that argument.

          1 -- In occupying a foreign land, you don't get to decide when your opposition quits shooting at you.

          2 -- Iraq isn't ANYTHING like the homogeneous countries that Japan, Germany and South Korea are.

          3 -- What triggered Al Qaeda's rage at America to begin with was our presence in Saudi Arabia. How do you think the announcement of intentions to occupy Iraq for 100 years will play on the Arab street?

          With those words, McCain handed bin Laden an enormous recruiting tool. He's already using it to the detriment of the USA.

          Reply

          2 Replies

          • 0%

            slate5 months, 2 weeks ago

            But you have to assume that they will fight for 100 years and or that we can't defeat them in that amount of time, for your wishful thinking to work ET.

            Reply

            1 Reply

            • 0%

              ETproductions5 months, 2 weeks ago

              They live there. We don't. Every occupation force that every tried to subdue a hostile local population in all of history has eventually gone down in defeat. The only way to defeat local resistance to occupation is to simply kill them all. We just have to figure out how we will justify slaughtering 26 million people, most of them innocent civilians. Somehow, I don't think "Bringing the benefits of democracy to Iraq." is going to work as a rationale.

              Reply
        • 0%

          mesodude5 months, 2 weeks ago

          http://politics.propeller.com/story/2006/12/27/...

          ;-x

          Reply
    • 0%

      Radiofreeeuropa5 months, 2 weeks ago

      It was inevitable after Cheneybush. But the damage from their malfeasance will last for generations- there will be no quick fix. No miracles. But a return to the rule of law, the constitution, the bill of rights, Habeas Corpus all will be returned overnight. The economy is another story, it took 50 - 60 years of an empowered middle class to create it, but only a few years of republican rule to loot it completely.

      Reply

      5 Replies

      • 0%

        memestryker5 months, 2 weeks ago

        A return to the constitution minus the 2nd amendment. That's a major sore point I have with the dems--I think the founders made it 2nd for a reason--a very good reason they understood very well. I get heartburn watching the 2nd endlessly infringed. It's a very important one, because it protects both my only reasonable means of self-defense and my only means ultimately to ward off tyranny.

        Reply

        4 Replies

        • 0%

          Radiofreeeuropa5 months, 2 weeks ago

          Jefferson was one of the principal architects of the bill of rights, he was clear about his intent, to prevent tyranny. In other words to keep government from getting uppity! All 3 candidates are for some gun control. BUT... this is a red herring issue because the POTUS has nothing whatsoever to do with this. The supreme court will not allow a repeal of the 2nd amendment, there will be no taking away of guns from anyone. Only the legislators can write these laws not presidents, and if they violate the 2nd amendment they will repealed by the supreme court. McCain seeks to limit the sales of certain weapons at gunshows, Hillary and Obama have identical ideas regarding cities being allowed to pass local handgun bans, all 3 have entertained banning "copkiller automatic weapons" based on pleas from law enforcement.

          Reply

          1 Reply

          • 0%

            Radiofreeeuropa5 months, 2 weeks ago

            I tend to believe that baning anything only makes Billionaires out of black marketeers (the real drug problem for instance). And criminals are merely inconvienienced . That being said, the president can say he likes this idea, but it means nothing. (even THIS supreme court won't violate the 2nd amendment).

            Reply

        • baddad59Comment removed: User banned.1 Reply

          • 0%

            memestryker5 months, 1 week ago

            baddad59,

            Yes, I get frustrated when they look for feel-good simplistic answers to show the public they're "doing something."

            We've seen with the night riders, where the police just ignored the people's cries for help (or joined in) and also the recent fiasco in Mexico where the military had to disarm the police because the police had become so corrupt (not rare in the U.S., either); thus I strongly think that we need to not let the police or the military gain too much power. The founders were against standing armies.

            As Radiofreeeuropa pointed out, prohibition just makes billionaires out of black marketeers.

            The founders trusted ordinary citizens to do the right thing, and so do I.

            Reply
  • 0%

    libsRfunny5 months, 2 weeks ago

    "Ugly people don't go away easily."

    Yeah, look how long you've been around LOL.

    It's all just wishful thinking on the part of liberals.

    Reply

    9 Replies

    • 0%

      Tangent0015 months, 2 weeks ago

      Another "I know you are, but what am I?" post.

      Clever.

      Reply

      5 Replies

      • 0%

        slate5 months, 2 weeks ago

        Another "I know you are, but what am I?" post.

        Clever.

        But you were so OK with the first nasty post weren't ya?

        Reply

        4 Replies

        • 0%

          doggammit5 months, 2 weeks ago

          Ugly is as ugly does, slate... and the public has the right to punish whomever it considers "ugly" at the polls. I don't think you or any other RW'er stands much of a chance in reversing public perception of how much draconian "ugly" the current regime has foisted upon America. Your only particle of RW hope lies with the upcoming NAU - a slate washing marriage of political convenience that will formally decouple the American republic from its constitutional and judicial identity and further cement the imperial aspect of RW totalitarianism into all facets of American political, social and economic life.

          Reply

          3 Replies

          • 0%

            doggammit5 months, 2 weeks ago

            Personally, I believe that powerful forces at work behind the scenes moving the NAU initiative along will win out in the end - with Phyrric consequences for all - after which you may have second thoughts about the steep price of foreclosure upon what once was the American Dream - not to mention the lockstep of "conservative" politics and the duopoly that is herding us into a direction that is at obvious odds with American democracy and political independence.

            Reply
          • 0%

            slate5 months, 2 weeks ago

            (Your only particle of RW hope lies with the upcoming NAU - a slate washing marriage of political convenience that will formally decouple the American republic from its constitutional and judicial identity and further cement the imperial aspect of RW totalitarianism into all facets of American political, social and economic life.)

            Plain a simply you are an Idiot!!

            I usually don't name call but in your case I'll make a warranted exception. Does that small mind of yours really think that I want to see the constitution shattered? As far as foreclosures, we had them in the 80s, I look around and see that we are still here.

            Reply

            1 Reply

            • 0%

              slate5 months, 2 weeks ago

              You see, I view this nation as resilient and vital. That doesn't mean there will be no rouge waves in the ocean as we sail along. That's the problem with people like you, you only see the bad and can't wait for bad news to dwell upon and take advantage of politically with the rest of the chicken little's; that see life in terms of having the potential of the sky falling. I'd guess that you seldom see the good things in life, even when or especially when you are in times of distress.

              You whine and cry and point fingers of blame and you don't even realize what you think is 'tough' un- survivable times of dread is nothing compared to the real hardships 4 billion other people on this planet actually have to deal with every day of their lives.

              Reply
    • 0%

      Radiofreeeuropa5 months, 2 weeks ago

      Um... na na na na na. (Is that the proper response?)

      Reply
    • 0%

      jordan115 months, 2 weeks ago

      Projection makes you look very foolish.

      Reply
    • 0%

      mesodude5 months, 2 weeks ago

      but libsr barely two months ago you said:

      "I'm wondering to what extent dems are crossing over to get RINO McCain nominated. If he gets the repub nod, Dems can't lose the white house."

      Hmmm...Once again, you're one of the biggest flip-flopping conjobs on Propeller. Why do you keep trying to forecast the future after you voted for Bush twice? This perplexes me... ;-)

      http://videos.propeller.com/story/2008/02/03/vi...

      Reply

• AtheismIsRealityComment removed: User banned.
• 0%

  aniokly5 months, 2 weeks ago

  There is probably no way Sen McCain could be elected President if he wasn't running against a Democrat. Obama is a joke. Everyday we discover more, and more about his secret past. By November his white Granny won't even vote for him.

  Reply

  17 Replies

  • 0%

    DropkickaLib5 months, 2 weeks ago

    This story reads like sour grapes from a Dem Party that is imploding.

    Reply

    4 Replies

    • 0%

      donald515 months, 2 weeks ago

      Delusional?

      Reply

      3 Replies

      • 0%

        slate5 months, 2 weeks ago

        Yes Donnie I think you are and have been for some time.

        You have watched the news lately right?

        If I remember correctly There is this 'progressive' party that is trying to deny one of their leaders the ability to stay in a race as long as she wants, cuz one half of the party (the most radical half) is trying to use strong arm tactics and as usual personal attacks.

        Reply

        1 Reply

        • 0%

          slate5 months, 2 weeks ago

          You sleep with radicals long enough and they begin to think you owe em.

          The Republicans have finally learned that about the radical fundies.

          Now the Dems will learn it, not by looking at the Rs and not going there, but just as the Rs, they think they can 'control' the radicals and will stubbornly has to learn at the school of hard knocks. Good luck with that.

          Let us know how it goes, the first time the radicals riot and burn stuff when the Dems don't fall in line and give the brats everything they demand, no matter how harmful it could be for their party or the country. You only think you know what implosion looks likes by watching the Rs lose after 2 terms, which historically has happened 99% of the time.

          Reply
      • 0%

        DropkickaLib5 months, 2 weeks ago

        the DNC, yes.

        Reply
  • 0%

    NoWayMan5 months, 2 weeks ago

    obama is such a joke that he has everyone on the right scared out of their skulls.

    so, joke's on you.

    Reply

    7 Replies

    • 0%

      aniokly5 months, 2 weeks ago

      Obama cannot eliminate a lady with almost as much baggage as he has, and he won't have the necessary 2025 delegates to win the nomination no matter how many more primaries he might win, and he might only win N C after his stupid remark about people clinging to guns, and God in hard times.

      Reply

      4 Replies

      • 0%

        NoWayMan5 months, 2 weeks ago

        wrong again ani.

        in fact, if everything goes to plan in the remaining primaries, it will look something like this:

        Guam, 50%-50%

        North Carolina 58%-42% Obama

        Indiana, 54%-46% Clinton

        Kentucky, 60%-40% Clinton

        West Virginia, 60%-40% Clinton

        Oregon, 56%-44% Obama

        Montana 56%-44% Obama

        Puerto Rico, 60%-40% Clinton

        if these are the results, Obama will only need 41% of the remaining unpledged superdelegates to put him over the top. currently he's picking up one superdelegate every day.

        and these results would be very generous to hillary since she has taken 60% or more of the vote in only one state, arkansas, clinton central.

        by contrast, Obama has taken 60% or more of the vote in 15 states!!

        so, if you run the numbers, rather than simply running your mouth, you'll see that its virtually impossible for this race to go any other way.

        Reply

        1 Reply

        • 0%

          Mdiar5 months, 2 weeks ago

          Last poll I saw had Obama winning Indiana by a bit, though really a statistical tie.

          Reply
      • 0%

        Lurch5 months, 2 weeks ago

        LMAO ani!

        Where do you get this carp?

        Obama has baggage? What baggage? You clowns are doing your darndest to make things other people say stick to Obama, meanwhile, your own candidate has ten times more real baggage - his life and his actions.

        McCain sucking up to the bigoted hate-mongering Rev Hagee.

        McCain insulting our veterans by voting against military funding five times aka VA.

        McCain hates the idea that our soldiers may have something better to do than be fodder for his plans for more military-entertainment complex massive handouts.

        McCain is Al-Queda`s choice for president, just like Bush was before him. AQ loves these Republican fools cause otherwise, by their own words, they would not be able to kill Americans.

        Reply

        1 Reply

        • 0%

          mesodude5 months, 2 weeks ago

          I imagine it must be unbelievably embarrassing and demoralizing (even more so than usual) to be a conjob right now. Instead of getting Huckleberry or Romney Warbucks, as a nominee, they got Glib Flip-flopper McLib. So their hopes of holding onto their ill gotten tax cuts and their dreams of overturning Roe v Wade (their reasons for getting out of bed in the morning) have been shot all to hell. It doesn't help that their idol Chimper's disastrous Presidency is nearly over and instead of going out in a blaze of glory (like that'd happen...lol), he's instead just disintegrating in a spectacular ball of flames. Poor cons... ;-(

          Reply
    • 0%

      Tangent0015 months, 2 weeks ago

      Agreed. Clinton would be easier to beat than Obama.

      Most of this has to do with the effort to keep the Democrats divided. Limbaugh has said as much, going so far as to urge Republicans to switch party affiliations so they can vote for Hillary in the primary.

      Historically speaking, the strategy is correct, if unspeakably filthy. When the candidacy is in bitter dispute at the time of the convention (regardless of the party), that party's candidate ends up losing the presidency.

      I blame Clinton and her handlers for a lot of it. She knows the delegate math doesn't work. If she manages to convince the super-delegates she is the most 'electable' and thereby secures the nomination, there will be a huge backlash and charges of a 'stolen nomination', and bye-bye white house.

      Reply

      1 Reply

      • 0%

        Radiofreeeuropa5 months, 2 weeks ago

        Actually he has for all intents and purposes beaten the horrendous odds of winning despite going up against the most seasoned formidable political machine in existence. The inevitable coronation of Hillary by the media and the constant attacks from the right that began well over a year ago (secret muslim, hates kittys, kills dogs, wants to take your gun away, poops on flags, secret nazi, knows someone who made a racist comment etc. etc. -my favorite was redlivers submitright here on propeller claiming he gave a bl**job to an insane asylum inmate, according to the inmate.) Winning despite this. Simply impressive. And without stooping to lies about his opponent. Even McCains campaign adviser claims he will step down if Obama is the candidate because he is too decent a man to slime.

        Reply
  • 0%

    Radiofreeeuropa5 months, 2 weeks ago

    Except only you and a handful of lump's sockpuppets even bother to read that trash. It keeps you entertained though.

    You haven't got anything remotely truthful to say about your own candidates, let alone one we know you seek to destroy.

    Reply
  • 0%

    ind065 months, 2 weeks ago

    His "secret" past. Oh heavens! I may never stop laughing!

    Reply
  • 0%

    Lurch5 months, 2 weeks ago

    Every one of the Republican Party`s juvenile attempts to call Obama names based on their mis-interpretations of things people around Obama said, turns around and bites them right in the arse.

    Wright, would be amusing except that McCain`s Rev. Hagee is even worse, so every time you clowns try to beat that dead horse you just look worse.

    Rezko, finally the trial you`ve been waiting all these weeks for in order to `get the dirt` on Obama, has also betrayed your smearing ways. The only dirt to come out of Rezco so far is that Rezco gave money to Bush who hasn`t given it back like Obama, Bush invited Rezco to dinner at the WH, and Rove actually illegally tried to obstruct justice in AG-Gate earlier than any one had believed before.

    LMAO. Every thing you people do, just bites you in the arse. Ever wonder why God hates you so much? No?

    Reply
  • 0%

    CRYMTYPHON5 months, 2 weeks ago

    "if he wasn't running against a Democrat?"

    Well, what would be fair to run him against? A Tory? A Wig? A llama? (not fair; everyone loves llamas even obama's mama would vote for the llama).

    McCain is a great guy; at Obama's Inaugural Ball, as the Dixie Chicks are playing Springsteen's 'Born to Run',

    I will be the first to toast McCain's continued good health, since he is after all old really really old.

    Reply
• 0%

  automan9095 months, 2 weeks ago

  America is too smart to vote for a racist America hater like him. If the Dems knew at the beginning of the primaries what they do now about him he would be losing big time right now. We just found out about the "problems" with him too late for Hillary. McCain has all the dirt on him though.

  Probably more to come too.

  Reply

  7 Replies

  • 0%

    mesodude5 months, 2 weeks ago

    "America is too smart to vote for a racist America hater like him"

    -I see...So they won't vote for Obama but they'll vote for the flip-flopping, Martin Luther King-hating, old-as-dirt McClame who denies health insurance to 10 million innocent American kids and votes against equal pay for women. ROTFLMAO. Do wingjobs EVER think before speaking or writing? I mean, we know they don't think before voting...

    Reply
  • 0%

    Tangent0015 months, 2 weeks ago

    Let's see: McCain consistently votes against care for our veterans, gleefully accepts the endorsement of someone who hates gays and thinks Catholics are "The Great ******" and has personally stated that he will hate "gooks" forever.

    Nice choice!

    Reply
  • 0%

    Radiofreeeuropa5 months, 2 weeks ago

    Automan, Right...

    We are still waiting for you show us a reputable source for a single accusation you have made since you began your slanders, I wonder why you never do? Not really.

    Reply

    2 Replies

    • 0%

      Radiofreeeuropa5 months, 2 weeks ago

      Repeating a lie over and over might make it true to your crowd, but most of us know this Bush tactic when we smell it!!

      "See in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." - Dubya

      Reply
    • 0%

      Georgia505 months, 2 weeks ago

      But the liberal slanders in here are well-established, correct?

      Put the kool-aid down and take the last plane out of Jonestown before it's too late.

      Reply
  • 0%

    NoWayMan5 months, 2 weeks ago

    yeah. I remember when he called asians "gooks"

    what a total racist.

    you were talking about McCain right?

    Reply
  • 0%

    Lurch5 months, 2 weeks ago

    OK, so let me get this straight.

    McCain himself has long held racist views, said racist things, and admits he does not have the emotional maturity to grow up and act presidential. McCain chases after and surrounds himself with bigots, racists, and hate-mongers for years, but thats ok because we all know that. McCain is openly chasing these people.

    However, some guy who Obama has denounced and distanced himself from says something you construe as racist and all of a sudden OBAMA is a racist?!

    Good lord the projection issues you people have!!

    Reply
• 0%

  eugenegerard5 months, 2 weeks ago

  The Republican Party is a criminal enterprise and should be indicted under the RICO ACT.

  Reply
• 0%

  scott42615 months, 2 weeks ago

  Great article!

  Reply

• catstevensComment removed: User banned.13 Replies

  • 0%

    HannibalBarca5 months, 2 weeks ago

    Your country is so divided that no matter who wins, all will feel like losers, it will get dirtier for sure, and people angrier.

    Reply

    6 Replies

    • 0%

      Mdiar5 months, 2 weeks ago

      We are always divided. Think back to how often you see petty, partisan games in US politics. Every couple of decades or so it just so happens everything comes to a peak and then peters out again for awhile, usually with one dominant party and the other providing a balance. Just as the Republicans gained a form of dominance with Reagan, the Democratic Party will with Hillary or Obama. Then, four years later, the GOP will have changed and will start to do a bit better, might see another Republican as President in 20 years if the Democrats don't screw up to badly and if they do then shorten that to 12 years. Maybe even 8.

      Reply

      3 Replies

      • 0%

        Radiofreeeuropa5 months, 2 weeks ago

        All generations with memory of Bush will have to be dead first, but yeah.

        Reply

        2 Replies

        • 0%

          Mdiar5 months, 2 weeks ago

          I don't necessarily believe all generations. Though, looking at how long it took for real Democratic dominance after the American Civil War and what had to happen, it very well could be. Then it was a very large lag before the Democratic Party became less powerful then the GOP, if we assign the Reagan election as when the GOP became "dominant" (though an incomplete dominance) again. It may very well take fifty years as opposed to the twenty I originally estimated.

          Reply
        • 0%

          mesodude5 months, 2 weeks ago

          TTWROOMM, radiofree...If the world has finally righted itself (or is that *un* righted itself?) I think we're looking at another 40 years (at a minimum) of Democratic party White House leadership. Bush and the GOP sealed their fates not only by repeatedly voting against the will of the people in general (often to disastrous results) but also by failing to get much of anything done for their core supporters (by which I don't mean the 28 percenters).

          Reply
    • 0%

      doggammit5 months, 2 weeks ago

      Rumor has it that you are a Canadian HB. If so - tell us all about KIM CAMPBELL and the post Mulroney carnage that left the Canadian equivalent of the GOP with one or two lousy seats in parliament. If long term political mismanagement and backroom deals make for an vengeful voting public, our own GOP could easily be whittled down to the kind of white elephant that fits into a china cup. We shall see soon enough!

      Reply

      1 Reply

      • 0%

        HannibalBarca5 months, 2 weeks ago

        How true, but there was not the bitterness as seen here, and also lying brian was the reason, we knew we had an ass for PM so as you say look what happened to Kim, will this happen to McC

        Reply
  • 0%

    Radiofreeeuropa5 months, 2 weeks ago

    Sorry cat, even if only half of the turnout at the primary shows up at the general, McCain will still be defeated, the numbers have shifted that much. If Obama wins the nomination, only 5 or six states can be counted on to go red, the rest are purple or blue. If Hillary wins you'll have a more traditional map but still if only half of Obama's supporters show up to vote for Hillary, republicans are still vastly outnumbered. What moron actually likes what has happened to this country since CheneyBush took office. That top 2% of obscenely wealthy has done well the rest of us have seen our quality of life and wealth disappear. Yet you like this? You want more! Just admit you were wrong, and your credibility will be greatly enhanced.

    Reply

    1 Reply

    • 0%

      Lurch5 months, 2 weeks ago

      Their entire goal is to beyatch and moan like they did in 2004 to the point they turned what was supposed to be a referendum on Bush into a referendum on Kerry.

      Well, it sure helped of course that the right-wing media led the charge against Kerry and gave Bush a seven year pass all told.

      Reply
  • 0%

    jordan115 months, 2 weeks ago

    we stand a chance of winning>>>>

    Of course you do. And if you do, it will be the straw that breaks the camel's back. And I know where you'll be found. Hiding under your bed.

    Reply
  • 0%

    Georgia505 months, 2 weeks ago

    Cat:

    Exactly. What's funny is their obliviousness to the corner they are backing themselves into, so they must project chaos onto the GOP.

    I guess arrested development short bus riders have to cope any way they can.

    Reply
  • 0%

    quackpot5 months, 2 weeks ago

    Just how many times do you, automan and ani expect to vote, cat?

    Reply
  • 0%

    TimALoftis5 months, 2 weeks ago

    unfortunately for the Republicans even quite a few conservative pundits are predicting Democratic gains in both the house and senate this fall. As for the White House...to the Republicans credit they nominated the only person within their party who has a shot at beating the Democrats this fall.

    Reply
• 0%

  Tcaros5 months, 2 weeks ago

  Most Americans know who the real terrorists are- the core Republicans who vote along with Bush.

  Did they ever find Bin Laden? Where they ever looking?

  Reply

  2 Replies

  • 0%

    Georgia505 months, 2 weeks ago

    bin Laden ever stop running?

    Reply

    1 Reply

    • 0%

      Lurch5 months, 2 weeks ago

      OBL is not running atm.

      He`s just backing McCain 100%.

      But who knows, McCain has not made his choice for VP yet, and we all know how much the Republican Party and their corrupt elite owe OBL!!

      Reply

• OnionHeadComment removed: User banned.2 Replies

  • 0%

    Tangent0015 months, 2 weeks ago

    All Hat, No Cattle.

    Reply

    1 Reply

    • 0%

      chuck-the-canuck5 months, 2 weeks ago

      Ten gallon hat, shot glass mind.

      Reply
• 0%

  aniokly5 months, 2 weeks ago

  Even the Democrat leadership knows now that Obama is a loser. The best they can do is sacriface the W H, and try to hold onto the House, and Senate. Everytime they uncover another of his terrorist friends, or another of his secret elitist speeches he sounds less, and less confident.

  Reply

  9 Replies

  • 0%

    Radiofreeeuropa5 months, 2 weeks ago

    Where is your link to a credible source? Despite the spin you know what? We know what Obama was talking about, was he even wrong? You don't think there are bitter voters who long ago gave up hope of any decent representation in DC? There are not voters who can be manipulated into believing candidate B is out to take your guns away. (All 3 candidates have similar positions on gun control, none want to take anyone's guns away) yet both McCain and Clinton have claimed that Obama wants gun control to gun groups, failing to mention that they too favor the exact same position. It's the old style "assume people are too stupid to fact check" politics. (In Hillary's case NYC has a gun ban). Yet somehow she is pro gun? I guess it sounds good, but as I say all 3 are the same on this issue.

    If that doesn't work use religion!Always works! Claim your the only true God candidate, portray your opponent as a satanist.

    Give us all a break, we are not stupid enough to fall for it.

    Reply

    3 Replies

    • 0%

      bill-smith5 months, 2 weeks ago

      --Give us all a break, we are not stupid enough to fall for it.

      Yes, but the fact is aniokly and her ilk are.

      Reply

      1 Reply

      • 0%

        Lurch5 months, 2 weeks ago

        The gullible roll like an avalanche. Ani is proof.

        Reply
    • 0%

      mesodude5 months, 2 weeks ago

      here are some helpful links (thanks, ybdogsct):

      ANIOKLY:

      http://newsquake.netscape.com/tag/propeller/

      ANIOKLY: "I believe most of the values voters will accept Rudy, warts and all. He is the best qualified, an administrator, not a legislator."

      http://politics.propeller.com/story/2008/02/03/...

      ANIOKLY: "What will stop McCain is his past stand on Amnesty. He is losing California, his home state of Arizona, and probably Texas. That is enough to put his nomination in jeopardy. God forbid Hillary has to run against a scandal free opponent. Woohoo!!"

      http://politics.propeller.com/story/2008/01/30/...

      ANIOKLY: "McCain is old. He needs a young Vice President. He is not going to get the Romney supporters after he drops out, but he might could pick up Giulianis if they cut a deal."

      Reply
  • 0%

    ind065 months, 2 weeks ago

    Terrorist friends! I almost forgot about that! Am I going to have to resurrect your ridiculous list of "charges" again? What was it up to, fourteen points?

    1) Obama was "friends" with a member of the Weathermen underground! When he was what, ten?

    2) Obama gives "secret" elitist speeches? Which you know all about apparently. You're a spy in the house of love, ani!

    Wow, in the face of such well-thought-through and utterly damning political hyperbole how can I help but change my vote!

    Reply
  • 0%

    Lurch5 months, 2 weeks ago

    McCain is a private-property stealing, vet-hating vet, gold-digging ****** hopper who dumped his wife and mother of his three children for a rich bimbo and home wrecker.

    McCain flip-flops almost as often as you make a logical fallacy ani. Almost.

    He`s a wuzzy sell-out who caved in on torture, taxes, and his own integrity.

    We need someone strong who can stand up to our enemies both foreign and domestic. McCain has proven beyond any reasonable doubt he cannot even stand up to the enemies in his own party. McCain is not worthy or ready to be CinC.

    Reply

    1 Reply

    • 0%