99)This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
Not a member? Sign-up today!
About Propeller | Frequently Asked Questions | Help
© 2003-2008 Propeller. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
SLATE:
"Oh but the fun the Dems had in the early open Republican primaries didn't bother the likes of you on the Left."
Sure it bothers me. Where did I say it didn't? Go ahead and quote my exact words back to me, if you can.
SLATE:
"stop whining,,,,, people can do with their vote as they wish,"
I suggest you take your own advice and stop your whining. The Party primaries are INTRAPARTY AFFAIRS, and since you're NOT a registered Democrat, your opinion is even more inconsequential than usual.
Your sense of self-righteousness is laughable considering the fact that the Republican Party also has Superdelegates; they just call them "Automatic Delegates."
LOL. Pathetic.
I agree you are quite pathetic indeed with the attitude you have on the subject at hand.
I am registered with no party, would that mean to you that I can't or don't deserve a vote? Or that I'm not allowed to vote any way I want? On a closed elitist mind would thnk that way.
If you had one candidate worthy to actually win without going all the way to this late in the game and the supers not have to come to play then you'd not have to have so many sleepless nights pondering the possibility that you may not get what you demand.
If the primaries in question are OPEN then they are OPEN to all Dems, Repubs and INDs., not just those you feel are worthy to cast a vote,,,,
You call me Self Righteousness? hehehe then why is it You are the ones upset because your lttle parade isn't going well. Heck I think it's fun to watch you guys freak out about it.
SLATE:
"I am registered with no party, would that mean to you that I can't or don't deserve a vote? Or that I'm not allowed to vote any way I want?"
Actually, that would mean to me that you are clearly illiterate, as I ALREADY stated below: "Of course, it would also be possible to close all primary elections, but I think disenfranchising Independents would be a graver injustice."
You can vote in any open primary you wish, but that should not override the Democrats' ability to choose their own candidate. This is NOT a general election; it is a PARTY PRIMARY and the PARTY chooses its nominee.
The fact that you continue to confuse the goals of the general election with the goals of a party primary comes as no surprise.
LOL.
"I agree you are quite pathetic indeed with the attitude you have on the subject at hand."
Can't say I disagree with you, Slate. He's a perfect example of the pompous, elitist a$$ produced by Yale, as is Al Gore. They must loathe the fact Bush went to Yale and did better than Gore.
What's the matter? Can't find a substantive argument to counter my own document-supported logic?
Why don't you cry about it?
I guess they didn't teach you that in Paparazzi school.
LOL.