218)This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
Not a member? Sign-up today!
cushi
JohnQPublic
2sidestoeverything
BronxBomber
ProudBlueTexan
Bacalao
loverman
transient
raats6662
Shadowolf
LumFan
PsychoHosebeast
augustine974
Goppy
GWHayduke
NoWayMan
Lurch
spkguy
baddad59
cowboygrandpa
mesodude
ML2007
donald51
bluetexasvalley
PapaWolf
miklkit
questionseverything
IneedIwantIgottahave
splitrch
Eagle Eye
Mdiar
Radiofreeeuropa
david_nwpa
AntiNeoCon
mntnman444
Will1313
Ciera Marie
smithichie
markmawn2
dadesider
About Propeller | Frequently Asked Questions | Help
© 2003-2008 Propeller. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
I can't believe Kevin James made a complete ass of himself, um oh wait, yes i can! What else do you expect?
"When you're in a hole, stop digging."
One thing about the pugs you have to admire: they always keep digging. I'm surprised they haven't reached China yet.
"When you're in a hole, stop digging."
ha haha hahahahahaha hahahahhAH...
It's best to not appear on the tube if you don't know your subject matter...
I think there may be a Cabinet position for Kevin James in the McCain Administration!
''One thing about the pugs you have to admire: they always keep digging. I'm surprised they haven't reached China yet.''
in a way they have
I've heard we owe China a lot of money for our hole-digging foreign policy
but don't worry
they tell us we're turning corners
....
maybe that's the problem
turning those corners and diggin sideways now
Just goes to show you should never try to shout down the guy who owns the switch to your microphone. James proved he was a babbling idiot with no earthly idea what appeasement even means. All he knows is it's a talking point the RepugniCons are supposed to tar their opponents with.
It was truly fun to watch Chris Mathews take the blow hard apart.
But this is exactly what every yahoo on these boards is like. They shout and argue but they have not a clue what they are arguing about.
Appeasement is giving something away.
Talking is discussing issues.
Bush/McCain are no better than Kevin.
Still, lmfao!! awesome!
"All he knows is it's a talking point the RepugniCons are supposed to tar their opponents with."
NEWS FLASH: Bush said he was referring to Jimmy Carter and not Obama.
Some liberal nuts might recall Carter recently meeting with Hamas. Last time Carter tried to broker a deal, Sadat was assassinated by the forerunners of Hamas and al Qaeda.
It's especially funny to know so many liberal nuts have referred to Matthews as a tool of the "vast right wing media." Just shows you how stupid that comment is and how far off to the left so many on this forum truly are.
Thank Gawd somebody showed up to prove that the video lesson is not learned!
Sadat was killed in October of 1981, ten months after Jimmy Carter left office. He was killed by his own military and all the perpetrators were either killed on the spot or captured and killed later.
Wrong president, wrong event, wrong year, wrong group, and wrong country.
Carter`s `deal` in the ME is the only one that is still functioning.
thanks for playing.
What's the matter libs, can't play Hardball?Try the ladies league.
...maybe he's just a soft-balls kinda guy...
I bet he has a high pitched voice too.
Looks like he's not a senior citizen like most of you who were "alive" then. Hell I didn't know the answer and quite frankly could give a $h1t. I think they both, esp. Matthews came off looking like an ass. As much of you, not all, hate Fox you'd never see that kind of questioning, not even O'Reilly,
low ball, "You don't know do you?". I didn't even count the times, Like that s...bag Chris spouted. Then again, MSNBC, what more can you expect?
I knew we could count on you to support the elimination of thinking when formulating an opinion, Scrimmy.
All Matthews asked of the blathering fool was to support his assertion with some fact. Like you, all he could do was regurgitate some easily digestible sound byte "appeaser" (kind of like 'decider' or 'evildoer' or 'mission accomplished' or....)without having a clue what he was supporting.
SOP of superficial knowledge.
Damn I stepped on dog $hit again.
Sh it happens when you go in your own pants.
"Hell I didn't know the answer and quite frankly could give a $h1t. "
--Um...if you're appearing on national television to attack a Presidential candidate based on a comparison to an earlier historical event, you absolutely had *better* give a $hlt. Cons love to cherry pick aspects of this war or that war in their desperate attempts to legitimize Bush's criminal and totally disgraceful rape of Iraq for oil. The illegal invasion of Iraq for oil will *never* be comparable to the WWII, cons. You weren't drafted, you didn't sacrifice anything, you got tax cuts, and the person you elected to run your country is a sick, murderous, disgusting clown. Bush is not, successful or even competent, he's not a hero and there's NO comparison to WWII. Get over yourselves. ROTFLMAO
Too much Rush Limpballs! lol
"NEWS FLASH: Bush said he was referring to Jimmy Carter and not Obama."
which means kevin james is even more stupid than we all thought since he was obviously talking about a comparison with obama, not carter.
so he was wrong on three counts:
- didn't know who bush was really talking about.
- didn't know the history of the chamberlain-hitler deal concerning czechoslovakia.
- didn't know the defintion of appeasement.
wow. you must be completely embarrassed that this dooshbag is on your side.
thanks for the heads up.