Join the Discussion

Comments So Far: 12

• 0%

  jordan114 months, 4 weeks ago

  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_a_New_...

  AH YES, the CONS who tried to get Clinton to depose Hussein.

  Reply

  9 Replies

  • 0%

    libsRfunny4 months, 3 weeks ago

    Careful, Liberals!! Karl Rove's gonna come get you in your sleep!!! LOL

    "The PNAC also supported the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 (H.R.4655), which President Clinton had signed into law.[11]"

    Oh my, Clinton was such a bad boy!!! Was he lying about Saddam's threat all the way back then?

    Reply

    8 Replies

    • 0%

      libsRfunny4 months, 3 weeks ago

      "[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."â;; From a letter signed by Joe Lieberman, Dianne Feinstein, Barbara A. Milulski, Tom Daschle, & John Kerry among others on October 9, 1998."

      Ohhh my!!!!

      Reply

      7 Replies

      • 0%

        libsRfunny4 months, 3 weeks ago

        "Saddam's goal â;¦ is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed."â;; Madeline Albright, 1998.

        "(Saddam) will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and some day, some way, I am certain he will use that arsenal again, as he has 10 times since 1983"â;; National Security Adviser Sandy Berger, Feb 18, 1998.

        The HOrror!!! The Horror!!!!

        Reply

        6 Replies

        • 0%

          libsRfunny4 months, 3 weeks ago

          "The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow."â;; Bill Clinton in 1998 .

          Well .. SHAZAM!!!!!!!!! Ole Slick Willie was in on it from the get-go.

          Reply

          5 Replies

          • 0%

            libsRfunny4 months, 3 weeks ago

            "Iraq is not the only nation in the world to possess weapons of mass destruction, but it is the only nation with a leader who has used them against his own people."â;; Tom Daschle in 1998.

            Tommy Boy!!! What are ya saying??? Ohhh my! Ohhh MY!!!!!

            Reply

            4 Replies

            • 0%

              libsRfunny4 months, 3 weeks ago

              "As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."â;; Nancy Pelosi, December 16, 1998.

              Ohhhhhh that Nancy girl was in on it, too. Such a cabal!! Such a CONSPIRACY!!!! Oh my, Libs, it's all over. Must be a pandemic!

              Reply

              3 Replies

              • 0%

                libsRfunny4 months, 3 weeks ago

                "Even today, Iraq is not nearly disarmed. Based on highly credible intelligence, UNSCOM suspects that Iraq still has biological agents like anthrax, botulinum toxin, and clostridium perfringens in sufficient quantity to fill several dozen bombs and ballistic missile warheads, as well as the means to continue manufacturing these deadly agents. Iraq probably retains several tons of the highly toxic VX substance, as well as sarin nerve gas and mustard gas. This agent is stored in artillery shells, bombs, and ballistic missile warheads. And Iraq retains significant dual-use industrial infrastructure that can be used to rapidly reconstitute large-scale chemical weapons production."â;; Ex-Un Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter in 1998.

                Now, that Scotty feller seemed like such a nice boy. He used to cut my grass!

                Reply

                2 Replies

                • 0%

                  libsRfunny4 months, 3 weeks ago

                  "What is at stake is how to answer the potential threat Iraq represents with the risk of proliferation of WMD. Baghdad's regime did use such weapons in the past. Today, a number of evidences may lead to think that, over the past four years, in the absence of international inspectors, this country has continued armament programs."Ã;¢;; Jacques Chirac, October 16, 2002.

                  Hoo boy!! Even that French fella was in on it!!! Man, it's a real ball o' confusion out there. These folk all lying and pulling them strings from behind the curtain. Yep, a real boondoggle.

                  Reply

                  1 Reply

                  • 0%

                    bubba24 months, 3 weeks ago

                    What an amazing display of pathetic SPIN.

                    You dredge out OLD statements from the Clinton administration to try to put the blame on THEM for BUSH's invasion of Iraq?

                    Erroneous and lame.

                    BUSH ordered the invasion, after HE and Rumsfeld and Cheney and Rice filled the nation's heads full of lies about the "threat" from Saddam.

                    There was NO threat - period.

                    TWO investigations by the REPUBLICAN-controlled Senate in 2005-2006 proved that all of the reasons used to go to war were FALSE.

                    And, a huge Pentagon report released earlier this year also proves that ALL of the reasons used by Bush and his cronies to invade Iraq were FALSE.

                    Reply
• 0%

  _kam0_4 months, 3 weeks ago

  Thanks to the Wayback Machine (at archive.org) the ramblings of mad men that is PNAC lives on in perpetuity.

  Reply

  1 Reply

  • 0%

    libsRfunny4 months, 3 weeks ago

    LEt's just hope Air America doesn't go Bankrupt again! Hoo boy, that'd be a loss!! Then that Al Franken feller couldn't repay all them back taxes and penalties for not providing workers compensation insurance for his employees.

    Reply