Politics

Guantanamo Trials Hit Setbacks
This story has mostly positive ratings. 111 votes / 5 sinks

Guantanamo Trials Hit Setbacks

Politics – Key elements of the Bush administration's anti-terrorist detention policies appear to be unraveling. A military judge disqualified a Pentagon legal official from participating in the trial of Salim Ahmed Hamdan, all charges against Mohammad al-Qahtani were dropped, and Sami Al-Haj was released after 6 years in detention without charge.

Tags: Guantanamo Bay, military commissions, torture, human rights, Justice Department

Report

Filter Comments ›
1 - 50 of 54 Comments by 24 members  RSS Feed for comments

1 2 > »

Add Comment
avatar
Reply

FTA: "Using torture to string together a web of so-called evidence is illegal, immoral and cannot be the basis for a fair trial,"

Amen to that.

avatar
Reply

How much of the knowledge that the Bush administration pretended to have might have been achieved in same way? Most of the persons who left Guantanamo after years of arrestation, were released without any explanation. Perhaps, they will never have the chance to get to know what crimes they had been accused for. This kind of juridical treatment is not fitting in with my imagination of democracy! It is for good reasons that confessions made under the influece of torture are not usable in a court of law. We should know that since the times of inquisition.

avatar
Reply

They should all be shot instead of kept in jail.

The Geneva Convention says that if the enemy is not wearing a uniform identifying him then he is a spy and can be shot instead of captured.

By the way.. I have no problem water boarding someone to save American lives.

avatar
Reply

Man, when are people who keep defending this Administrations international law breaking going to actually READ the Geneva Conventions...

The Geneva convention says that non uniformed soldiers/ members of the armed forces(aka troops recognized as such by their home country's government) can be treated as spies. Since nobody in all of Gitmo is a soldier, or recognized as such by their home country(or any country for that matter) it does not apply here...

Just ask yourself this if you still don't agree.. What is a terrorists "Uniform"? How does one say a group of people are out of uniform if they have no official uniform, and are not sanctioned by a government to be said governments army?

avatar
Reply

Not just that, but...when are people going to learn how to reason using basic logic?

automan said, "...if the enemy is not wearing a uniform identifying him then he is a spy and can be shot instead of captured."

His statement about shooting detainees rather than capturing them assumes these people are enemies without any kind of legal determination that they are, indeed, enemies.

automan proposes shooting suspects on the spot. Sounds positively...totalitarian.

avatar
Reply

Sounds like what Terrorists do... No trial, no judge, no jury. Just call em infidels and kill em... Sad part is, a large portion of "Freedom loving" Americans think this way, with absolutely no realization that they are supporting something the "enemy" would do. Something that is supposed to be one of the things that separates us from them...

avatar
Reply

Unfortunately, those freedoms and rights that separate us from them have all been "temporarily" suspended in order to fight terrorism.

How do Bush supporters not understand that we've become exactly what we're supposed to be fighting against?

avatar
Reply

Sometimes when you fight rats you have to get in the sewer.

avatar
Reply

Not if you're trying to convince all the others watching that you're better than the rats.

avatar
Reply

True, sometimes you do have to 'get in the sewer' and fight the rats and sometimes 'you do become like' the very enemy you are fighting.

avatar
Reply

Undercover cops can have the same problems.

avatar
Reply

Gee, thanks Beau. ;-)

avatar
Reply

gitmo and iraq are undercover jobs? so what are we disguising? our motive?

avatar
Reply

that used to be called lying

avatar
Reply

So you would be against undercover cops?

avatar
Reply

oh, now i get it! giant rat suits are gonna be our new uniform! good idea. wouldn't want to break any geneva convention laws

avatar
Reply

You have to try and understand the conversation before you become involved. Try and read the posts again and see if you can pick up on the points being made.

avatar
Reply

Undercover cops *pretend* to do all the same things the criminals they're infiltrating do.

But they're not allowed to actually take drugs, have sex with hookers, or kill mobsters.

Right?

In addition, undercover cops' main goal isn't to prevent the creation of more criminals. They're not trying to convince innocents that being criminal is wrong--they're simply trying to catch criminals.

When our country begins to operate like terrorists, foreigners who are not terrorists can't see why they should align themselves with us.

avatar
Reply

i did, so let me be crystal clear with the point i was trying to make to you that you didn't catch on to.

your analogy is crap

avatar
Reply

be nice...lol

avatar
Reply

Christopher Bollyn was not even framed for terrorism. He was arrested by secret police and subjected to a show trial, simply for expressing the wrong opinions regarding the the war on terror and Israel. He fled to Europe with his family, or else he might be worse off than Guantanamo prisoners. He could be a sex slave in a maximum security prison. See "The Bollyn Trial: The Criminalization of an Outspoken Journalist," http://donoevil.propeller.com/story/2008/05/21/...

avatar
Reply

"Just ask yourself this if you still don't agree.. What is a terrorists "Uniform"? How does one say a group of people are out of uniform if they have no official uniform, and are not sanctioned by a government to be said governments army?"

Uhhhhh, this is exactly why the Geneva Convention was had and why it does not apply to these people.

They are not following the rules of the Geneva Convention but you want the rules of the Geneva Convention to apply to THEM???

What the heck sense does that make???

As far as torture goes I'm sorta split, is it worth torturing 20, 30, 300 innocents to find the one guy who was planning on blowing up a football stadium full of people?

avatar
Reply

Isn't that what our courts have said for 200 years, innocent until proven guilty and we have to have reasonable doubt. We also have to have a fair trial.

These concepts were settled 200 years ago.

Why do you think you can change them now?

avatar
Reply

"As far as torture goes I'm sorta split, is it worth torturing 20, 30, 300 innocents to find the one guy who was planning on blowing up a football stadium full of people?"

huh? so it's a numbers thing to you and not a question of respecting and upholding civilized behavior to salvage your own dignity and humanity. and how do you know anyone was planning on blowing up a football stadium full of people? seems to me you just pulled that one out of your butt to try and give your lame point some moral clout. you've been watching way too much 24

avatar
Reply

"They should all be shot instead of kept in jail. "

You mean the Bush administration, right?

avatar
Reply

No, I think he meant the terrorists. You know, the ones who protest Teddy Bears named Muhammed and not retarded girls strapped up with bombs to kill Shiite children in pet stores.

avatar
Reply

Oh. I'm surprised he didn't mean the monsters that invaded another country, killed 4000 of their own, wounded hundreds of thousands of others and killed hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis and Afghanis due to an ethnic-cleansing euphimism called "collateral damage."

avatar
Reply

GOOD bit of taqqiya, O "I'm not a Muslim".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hZrZx1eHdg

avatar
Reply

"GOOD bit of taqqiya, O "I'm not a Muslim". "

Now I completely understand your obsession with lying.

It's projection.

Unfortunately 4000 dead Americans, tens of thousands of severely wounded Americans and many more mentally wounded Americans along with hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis and Afghans due to 'collateral damage' aren't lies of any sort.

avatar
Reply

What, are you saying American troops deaths are caused by American troops now? I wouldn't be surprised, since you think it's American troops that have caused most of the suicide bomb attacks in Shiite market places, etc., since THAT is the reason so many Iraqis have been killed over there since American troops arrived on the scene.

avatar
Reply

how do you know? nobody's counting, remember? it's like what powell called "the pottery barn rules" you break it, you bought it. well, it's broken.

avatar
Reply

It's true. MORE Iraqis have been killed by Iraqis than by American troops, mostly because the they view the other one siding with the those they view as infidel occupiers.

avatar
Reply

Somebody that you don't know might decide that you are a terrorist because the name automan909 is about the same as automan 989.

Then, after holding you for six years without trial (opportunity for you to correct the error) they might let you go.

After this, I hope you will be highly thankful for the experience when some idiot suggests that you should have been shot straight away.

avatar
Reply

909 or 989. your point reminds me of that movie Brazil. buttle or tuttle. what's in a name when it leads to indefinite detention, torture and an unknown unheard of death.... of the wrong suspect. only a wife and some kids dealing with unresolved grief and a burning growing hatred against a monolithic far away power that is so incomprehensible it may as well be aliens from another planet.

nevermind, it's just "justice" seen to be done and that's all that matters to automan and others.

all the while justice slowly dies

avatar
Reply

Automan909,

The charges against the Guantanamo prisoners are proven lies, and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was killed in Karachi on September 11, 2002. Although I take back what I once said about the prisoner being Ahmed Abdul Qadus. See "Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was killed six years ago." http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aachat_alternativ...

It is also as certain as anything can be that our own government perpetrated the September 11 terrorism, with some help from the Mossad and MI6. Attention sock puppets: you lack the honesty and courage of hired assassins and traitors for money. You are also fools. Whatever you are being paid, it is not enough.

avatar
Reply

Auto,

You are a savage fool. For only a savage would advocate shooting innocent people and only a fool would believe that random executions of the innocent saves American lives.

avatar
Reply

I have no words to describe people with opinions like automan's.

Nor for scrimshaw and crghss who voted for his comment.

This is the "They should be shot" comment, in case this finishes somewhere completely "other".

A million sinks to you 3.

avatar
Reply

We may find out the real truth now as more can speak -- not the Bush/Cheney neocon story

avatar
Reply

It seems like we have turned into the Soviet Union that I grew up fearing - complete with its gulags in Siberia.

avatar
Reply

I wasn't aware of the prisoners in the gulags were given three squares a day that is also religous friendly, prayer blankets and allowed to plat soccer. I wonder why millions died in gulags? Bad water maybe?

avatar
Reply

wow, you make them sound like.... pets.

let's put you on leash, danel, and after a few years let's see just how grateful you are to have your 3 squares. btw, you can forget about your home, you family and everything and everyone you every knew. you won't be needing those memories coz you'll never have anything to do with them ever again. all you'll have is a cage, a mat and 3 squares.

but hey, 3 squares, right? yipee!!!

avatar
Reply

once again you don't understand the conversation before you jump in. Maybe you should have someone read the posts to you.

avatar
Reply

it seems to be your thing to treat everyone as pets. you overestimate your intelligence, danel. you're just not that smart

gulag or no gulag, you talk as if the pets at the gitmo pound should be grateful. your point? feel free to disagree and say why once you're done patronizing

avatar
avatar
Reply

If the captives are prisoners in a "War on Terrorism," then they should be afforded all the protections due to prisoners of war and these trials are a violation of their rights under international law. If, on the other hand, these prisoners are criminals, then they are due all the rights and protections due other criminal defendants, including the right of habeus corpus, the right to a speedy trial, and the right to defense counsel of their choosing.

Either way, it is obvious that the current administration has screwed it up.

avatar
Reply

The biggest thing that sets our society apart from most others is that we have freedoms and rights. To maintain that structure for our people we often must work to protect the freedoms and rights of those we most violently disagree with.

Once we cross the line saying certain individuals or groups not longer deserve those freedoms and rights we set up a sitaution where we may be in the next group outcast. Hard as it is sometimes the only way to protect what we all appreciate is to protect the same things as strongly as we can for those we most hate and disagree with. Thats the way our republic works. For those not sure we are not a democracy where everyone has a say in every decision, we are representative republic where we vote for representatives that represent in the government.

avatar
Reply

The United States is a mobocracy which has been seized by Zionist Bolsheviks.

avatar
Reply

Zionist Bolsheviks???????

Ok how about

Marxist Muslims?

Has a nice ring to it.

avatar
Reply

I just called them Bolsheviks because of their totalitarianism and fanaticism, and especially their hypocrisy. They are would be Lenins and Stalins.

avatar
Reply

I guess that the three in the "neg" section below have no faith in Habeus Corpus or the right to be confronted by their accuser in a court of law. Just declair them guilty and kill them.....

1 2 > »

Add Comment

You must log in first to post a comment. Secure Signin

Not a member? Sign-up today!


Who voted on this story?

View all (110) »

Who sunk this story?

Channels
AnchorsArt & DesignAutos
BooksCareers & JobsCelebrities
Do No EvilDo-It-YourselfFamily
FoodGadgets & TechGay & Lesbian
Health & FitnessHumorLove & Personals
MenMoneyMovies
MusicNewsPets
PoliticsPopular VideosReal Estate
ReligionScienceShopping
SportsTelevisionTravel
VideoVideo GamesWomen