McCain's strategy on the Clark comments »
Posted By Wil 3 months, 1 week ago in NewsThe McCain campaign's angle here is to not to prevent attacks on the integrity of McCain's war record (which Clark explicitly did not do) but to make it off limits for anyone to question that his war-time experience means he has the temperament and experience which make him the better qualified candidate to be president.
Read Full Story at talkingpointsmemo.com »
Submitted By:
I'm a Propeller Scout, and I run the Geek group. I'm a writer and actor who loves technology and science fiction. But I ...
Also submitted:
Related Articles:
Why not submit a story?
Join the Discussion 
+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 1
-

Wil3 months, 1 week ago
FTA: "The McCain campaign's claim that there's any attack here on McCain's war record is simply a lie -- a simple attempt to fool people. This is an essential point to this entire campaign -- does McCain's military record mean that even the Democrats have to concede the point that he's more qualified to be commander-in-chief of the US armed forces, that his foreign and national security policy judgment is superior to Obama's? It's simply a fact that McCain has a record of really poor judgment on a whole list of key foreign policy and national security question"
As another story on Propeller said, Clark wins on truth, while McCain wins on spin.
I think this is the beginning of the media free ride we've all been expecting McCain to get, which is going to make it doubly hard for Obama: he's got to fight the entire GOP slime machine, and a national media that's positively infatuated with McCain.
Reply





Add a Comment
Please keep your comments relevant to this story.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.