Continuing Improvements. Tell Us How We’re Driving! Send us Feedback

New Yorker Cover Depicts Conspiracists' Nightmare of Real Obama's »

Posted By TimALoftis 2 months, 4 weeks ago in News
6.0

Scale of 1 to 10

Read: 90

Propped: 39

Comments: 26

Click Prop It to Raise Score
Prop it

Obama spokesperson Bill Burton: "The New Yorker may think, as one of their staff explained to us, that their cover is a satirical lampoon of the caricature Senator Obama's right-wing critics have tried to create. But most readers will see it as tasteless and offensive. And we agree."

Read Full Story at blogs.abcnews.com »

26 Comments Report

Submitted By:
TimALoftis

Welcome To Propeller !

If you like 'Social News' and making friends and conversation with both a mature and informed community - this site is for you ...

Also submitted:

Related Articles:

Why not submit a story?

Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 26
  • 0%
    TimALoftis2 months, 4 weeks ago

    tasteless and offensive indeed.

    Reply
    • 0%
      CRYMTYPHON2 months, 4 weeks ago

      It is hard to believe that the New Yorker would be gullible, naive and unsophisticated enough not to see such a depiction for what it is: a slanderous assault.

      Pathetic.

      Reply
      • 0%
        JoseMadre2 months, 4 weeks ago

        I personally think a portrait of Mao or Che would be more appropriate.

        Reply

        1 Reply

        • 0%
          Dionys2 months, 4 weeks ago

          You're right. It'd be better to see a cover with Mao, representing China, eating babies (like they did during the cultural revolution), representing the US. During the olympics.

          Reply
        • 0%
          silvera2 months, 4 weeks ago

          In my opinion The New Yorker has always been a little self consciously hip. I'm sure they think they are being so clever and satirical with the cartoon but I'm afraid, as someone mentioned in the article, it will just feed the beast and become a recruitment poster for the ignorant right. I'm sure that when Fox "News" gets a copy they'll flog it to death in that cute little way they have.

          New Yorker, you crossed the line.

          Reply
          • 0%
            aniokly2 months, 4 weeks ago

            Even if the N Yer changed the front cover by Monday every computer in the world has already shown the picture. Even the article makes Obama just look like another Corrupt Chicago Politician.

            Reply

            1 Reply

            • 0%
              bruhaha2 months, 3 weeks ago

              You didn't even read the article

              Reply
            • 0%
              automan9092 months, 4 weeks ago

              If it quacks like a duck... It's a duck

              Reply

              3 Replies

              • 0%
                NoWayMan2 months, 4 weeks ago

                you and poeple like aniokly just don't get it, do you?

                the new yorker cover, misguided as it is, is actually calling you, and people like you, an idiot for believing all this "secret muslim" nonsense.

                Reply
                • 0%
                  Beau78902 months, 4 weeks ago

                  Then I guess that makes you a duck, automan. You quack on every thread about Obama out here.

                  Reply
                  • 0%
                    bill29362 months, 4 weeks ago

                    Maybe that is why Obama and his supporters are quacking so much.

                    Reply
                  • 0%
                    NoWayMan2 months, 4 weeks ago

                    in reality this is a case of the new yorker being too clever for its own good. and in the process of making a joke about the cons who believe the "secret muslim" nonsense, they've actually given the right some visual ammunition to use since most cons will certainly re-appropriate the image for their own (most likely lame) joke while not seeing that they are the ones who are the actual butt of the joke.

                    it would have been a better, but more obvious, joke if it was a picture of McCain and Cindy in the oval office dressed as a muslim and terrorist doing the "secret muslim handshake." that way it would have been clear who the joke is aimed at. but the new yorker chose to out-clever themselves, and in the end made a misguided and tasteless play.

                    me thinks (me hopes at least) the new yorker mulled over this point then went with the obamas in the picture instead of the mccains since they wanted to create controversy (read: sales) around the picture. which they did.

                    Reply
                    • 0%
                      aniokly2 months, 4 weeks ago

                      I haven't finished the article, but I don't think the author knew that in naming some of Obama's nearest, and dearest he included some of Chicago's most corrupt politicians. Want to bet not only will Obama not be the next President, but he will not be reelected in 2010 either.

                      Reply

                      1 Reply

                      • 0%
                        bruhaha2 months, 3 weeks ago

                        And McCain is an angel....yeah right.

                        Reply
                      • 0%
                        bill29362 months, 4 weeks ago

                        I wonder if those that are against the cover would say the same if it were a cover than were considered anti-McCain?

                        Reply

                        1 Reply

                        • 0%
                          cosmogenium2 months, 4 weeks ago

                          We would if you could come up with something equally offensive.

                          Reply
                        • 0%
                          Tcaros2 months, 4 weeks ago

                          They mentioned that 12% of voters still think Obama was raised Muslim!

                          I mentioned this on one of my posts. We have some real idiots out there who affiliate themselves with the Republican party.

                          Here's what they say, "Ah, well you know that Obama is a Muslim. We can't have a Muslim in the White House."

                          These are the same idiots who fell hook and sinker over the "Fox news generated" scandal about the pastor in his Christian church. Now does that make any sense?

                          Reply

                          4 Replies

                          • 0%
                            bill29362 months, 4 weeks ago

                            I have heard many Democrats say the same thing in the primary as a reason to vote for Hillary. Now did they mean it then? Will these Democrats feel the same in November?

                            Reply
                            • 0%
                              nostalgia2 months, 3 weeks ago

                              "We have some real idiots out there who affiliate themselves with the Republican party."

                              I guess you ignored the polls that were being taken during the primary

                              "the impression that Obama is Muslim crosses party lines: 14% of Republicans, 10% of Democrats and 8% of independents think he is Muslim."

                              http://people-press.org/report/?pageid=1277

                              Reply

                              2 Replies

                          Add a Comment

                          Forgot your password?

                          Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

                          To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

                          Got a Story?

                          Story Tags ?

                          Groups Watching This

                          No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your group?

                          Advertisement